Author: John Kaufmann

Someone forwarded to me an email blast from Pat Kane announcing a series of meetings at his house to organize a petition drive to once again put a referendum for charter change on the November ballot. According to the email (see below), Gordon Boyd will “explain the features and the benefits of  the 2019 proposed charter” to those attending.

For those of you interested in assisting in their petition drive, the meetings will be on July 15, 17, and 18 at 7:00 PM at Pat Kane’s on 19 Marion Place.

For those of you who may be new to this blog, I have documented two very disturbing incidents involving Mr. Kane’s behavior. They can be found here and here,

Mr. Boyd has also distinguished himself in a number of unfortunate ways most recently during the previous attempt to pass a charter change in the city to adopt a city manager form of government. Most troubling was his behavior during a “debate” with John Franck which involved a number of attacks on John Franck’s character. Many of these mocking slurs regarding John Franck were later included in a mailing done on behalf of charter change.

I have to ask, does this city deserve to be subjected to yet another political battle over the city’s form of government full of acrimonious attacks and disinformation? Can’t the supporters of the change to a city manager form of government find leadership that this time embraces civility and a scrupulous commitment to accuracy and fairness? One can only hope.

From: “Patrick Kane” <pkane1@nycap.rr.com>

Date: July 13, 2019 at 11:19:41 PM EDT

To: “Holly Schwarz-Lawton”, “Michael Levy” , “‘Leona Beck'” , “‘Maureen Wendell'”, “Tom Gibbs” , “Ms. Mary-Ann Klemm” , “Margaret Prough” , “Margie Van Meter” , “Mary Kelly”, “Mike Los”, “Mike Perkins” , “Dennis Bigansky” , “Molly Corbett” , “Molly Gagne” , “Nedra Stimpfle” , “Otis Maxwell” , “Josephine Pasciullo”, “Shawn Thompson”, “Craig and Milissa Klotz”, , “Ron Kim” , “Raymond Giguere”, “‘Rita Forbush'”, “‘Rob Wright'” , “Suzanne Singer” , “Tim Holmes”, “Thomas Montelone”, “Zealie Van Raalte” , “‘Tony Oehler'” , “‘Tom Denny'” , “terry lowenthal” , “Vicki Addesso-Dodd”, <valerie_keehn, “Arliss Nygard” , “Gordon and Sharon Boyd”, “Brenda Corbett” , “Christine M. Carsky” , “Christina Brueggemann”, “Daniel De Federicis” , “Evelyn Hefner”, “James C. Helicke” , “Jeff Wendell”, “John Van der Veer” , “Michael Englert”, “Nurcan Atalan”, “Pat Design”, “sabine beisler” 

Subject: Mark Your Calendars  Citizens Charter Initiative 2019

Reply-To: <pkane1@nycap.rr.com>

Subject: Mark Your Calendars Citizens Charter Initiative

Hello

We have a big week ahead!!!

Please join us on this week to discuss the progress of the citizen initiative for Charter 2019.

You can pick whatever night that works for you!

Available nights to hear about the citizen’s petition and the and the timing of the petition drive.

Monday July 15 @ 7:00 PM

Wednesday July 17 @ 7:00 PM

Thursday July 18 @ 7:00 PM

Gordon Boyd will explain the features and the benefits of the 2019 proposed charter.

All areas of this effort will be discussed.

We are meeting at my house at 7:00 PM at 19 Marion Place ( behind the Lake Ave Elem. school)

Taking To The Streets

The Petition Kick-off will be held on SATURDAY JULY 20 at 9:00 AM

We will meet at 19 Marion Place to begin the petition drive. We will leave from here and hit the streets.

We will have a ton of fun and collects signatures

Please bring other charter enthusiasts and plan on

Respectfully

Patrick Kane

518-857-6129

Saratoga Hospital has announced the purchase of land for its proposed medical offices from D. A. Collins. The 16 acres were purchased for $3.15 million which the hospital characterized as under-market value. They described the price as an expression by the Collins family of its support for the hospital.

After expressing support for the sale, David Collins is quoted as saying that “…for a variety of business reasons, now is the right time to close the deal.” Echoing this, Theresa Skaine, chairperson of the hospital’s board of trustees said in the release, “D.A. Collins has been more than patient, and it is unreasonable for us to expect them to delay the sale and forgo potential business opportunities any longer. At the same time, we simply could not take the risk that the last piece of land within walking distance of the hospital would be lost to us—and this community—forever.”

At the time I read this release I did’t know if I was reading into it but it seemed that the Collins family was pressing to finalize an agreement. The project has been stalled for several years while the issue of whether to make it a planned unit development and then whether to rezone the land delayed action.

Subsequently, I watched the video of the July 2nd meeting at which Angelo Calbone addressed the City Council. He was responding to allegations that the hospital, by purchasing the land, was putting pressure on the Council. He told the Council that the Collins family wanted to complete the sale this summer and that this precipitated the purchase now.

In response to the release about the land sale, the neighbors sent an email to me ripping the hospital for what they characterized as “arrogant, high handed conduct.” They asserted that the hospital is going forward with the purchase of land for its proposed medical office building “…for which they have none of the necessary approvals.” They also asserted that the hospital purchased the property to bring pressure on the City Council.

The neighbors’ comment seems to indicate that there may be some confusion as to the steps the city must go through before an actual plan for the hospital’s project is even looked at. I thought it might be helpful to review those steps that have already been taken and those that will still need to happen before the hospital can begin to build.

The first step was taken in 2015.

The Comprehensive Plan, adopted by the City Council in 2015, recommended changes for a number of areas in the city. The land the hospital has purchased is located in one of these areas.  State law requires the city to come up with zoning for these areas that would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. To meet this requirement the city hired a  consulting firm to update all of the city ordinances including the changes recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. All of these changes together are known as the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).

Both the county and the city planning boards have offered advisory opinions to the City Council regarding whether the proposed zoning changes recommended by the consultants comply with the city’s Comprehensive Plan. The Saratoga County Planning Board approved the zoning category originally offered by the consultants for the parcels that include the land the hospital hopes to build on. The Saratoga Springs  Planning Board chose a zoning category that was slightly more restrictive for these parcels but that still allowed the hospital to construct a medical office building. The City Council will make the final decision.

I guess people of good faith could argue over whether the actions of these planning boards represented “approvals” but there is little question that their actions have helped move the process forward for the hospital.

So what are the remaining steps that will need to be taken for the hospital to build its medical office building? There are three additional actions the hospital must go through before it can build its proposed medical office building.

SEQR

The entire Unified Development Ordinance, which includes the parcels affected by the 2015 Comprehensive Plan, must go through the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) determinations. (For an excellent explanation of SEQR, Here is a link). An agency must be chosen to be the “lead agency” in dealing with SEQR. As the City Council acted as lead agency for the SEQR for the 2015 Comprehensive Plan, I anticipate they will take a similar role here.

The process is somewhat confusing as the SEQR process is mostly designed for dealing with actual construction projects. Many if not most of the questions in a SEQR application are more applicable to the review of an actual proposed project rather than policies.

The city had to follow the SEQR process before approving the Comprehensive Plan in 2015. In that case Brad Birge, the city planner, along with then Mayor Joanne Yepsen  walked the members of the Council through the relevant answers in the SEQR application. Birge had already put in answers and the Council simply agreed with what he had done. At the end of the meeting the Council unanimously issued a “Negative Declaration” which meant that the Comprehensive Plan would have no negative impact on the environment.

I am assuming the Council will follow a similar procedure for the UDO SEQR.

The problem that the neighbors face is that the SEQR vote is not about an actual project but the set of zoning changes that would allow for certain projects to occur in certain areas. At this stage there is no actual plan from the hospital to evaluate. It is difficult to discuss traffic, lighting, etc. without a specific proposal to critique. The neighbors can speculate about what impact a proposed project might have but it will be difficult to put that square peg into the round hole which is the set of questions actually in the SEQR application.

They also face the problem that the city has already determined that the use of this property for a medical office building will not have a negative environmental impact when they approved the Comprehensive Plan back in June of 2015. The vote of the Council at that time was unanimous.

Chris Mathiesen, who was Commissioner of Public Safety at the time, later expressed regret for his vote noting that protecting the neighborhood near the hospital should have been a priority and that he was unaware of the potential impact of the proposed change to that area when he voted to accept the Comprehensive Plan and supported the negative declaration for the SEQR. Still, his effort to reverse the decision received no support from his fellow Council members at the time.

It should be noted that reopening the Comprehensive Plan to reconsider the area around the hospital could lead to a whole series of other challenges to decisions that were made about preserving the greenbelt for instance. There were many contentious battles over what permitted uses there would be in that area that could be revisited if the neighbors were to be successful in getting the Council to reopen any part of the Comprehensive Plan.

Adoption of UDO (Zoning Changes)

The next step after the SEQR review is for the Council to adopt the UDO. This would include adopting the revised zoning map for the city. This will require a majority vote by the Council.

Site Plan Review By The Planning Board

Assuming the zoning changes are approved the hospital would now be able to bring forth a specific plan for a medical office building. The plan would then be subject to site plan review by the Planning Board. The Planning Board must review the proposed construction and either approve the hospital’s plans or require changes in the plan to address any adverse effects they determine it might have on the area. It is at this point that the specifics of traffic, lighting, setbacks, etc. will be addressed.

It Still Comes Down To The Comprehensive Plan

While the attorney for the neighbors asserts that the rezoning for the UDO deserves a “positive declaration (It will have a major environmental impact),” it is unlikely that that will happen.  Were the neighbors then to sue it would seem it would be difficult for them to prevail given the history of all the unanimous actions by the previous Councils and planning boards.

I am not a lawyer but it appears to me that the only way forward for the neighbors is to get the City Council to amend the Comprehensive Plan, a process as noted earlier that could have some unanticipated consequences. As I find it unlikely that the Council will complete the process of adopting the UDO before November, this issue could play a role in the upcoming November election. All the candidates will be under pressure by the protagonists in this conflict to come out for or against revising the Comprehensive Plan. Judging by the signs opposing the hospital in the adjacent neighborhoods, there is a constituency that feels passionately about the issue and will vote accordingly. My own sense is that outside of those neighborhoods there is less interest in the outcome and probably considerable support for the hospital in light of its role of providing healthcare to the community. We may find out how the public feels in November.

Below are the press release from the hosptial and the email from Dave Evans

N E W S   R E L E A S E

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 27, 2019

Saratoga Hospital Buys Land on Morgan Street for Future Growth

Seller cites healthcare services as ‘best use’ for the property

SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY, June 27, 2019—Saratoga Hospital has bought land on Morgan Street from D.A. Collins Companies to ensure that the last undeveloped parcel bordering hospital-owned property can be used to expand healthcare services.

The sale of the 16 acres was completed Wednesday. The under-market purchase price of $3.15 million reflects the Collins family’s support of the hospital.

“Ever since we decided to sell the property, we hoped it would go to Saratoga Hospital,” David Collins said. “We believe in the work of the hospital and its essential, unique role in ensuring the health of Saratoga. Given the location of the property, healthcare is clearly the best use, and for a variety of business reasons, now is the right time to close the deal.”

Saratoga Hospital has long been interested in the parcel as a natural, strategic option for much-needed expansion to keep pace with one of the fastest-growing counties in New York State. A proposed zoning change—part of a multiyear effort to align the city’s zoning map and comprehensive plan as required by state law—would enable medical office use on the property.

“D.A. Collins has been more than patient, and it is unreasonable for us to expect them to delay the sale and forgo potential business opportunities any longer,” said Theresa Skaine, chairperson, Saratoga Hospital Board of Trustees. “At the same time, we simply could not take the risk that the last piece of land within walking distance of the hospital would be lost to us—and this community—forever.”

She described the purchase as “another smart, targeted investment in the future of healthcare in the Saratoga region. Whether we’re talking about technology, facilities or programs, patient care is the determining factor behind every dollar we spend and every decision we make,” Skaine said.

The hospital wants to develop the land on Morgan Street for a medical office center where physicians could more easily collaborate on patient care and, in an emergency, could get to the hospital within minutes. Aside from that project, currently there are no other plans for the site.

A small group of residents in the mixed-use neighborhood surrounding the hospital opposes the medical office plans and is fighting the rezoning proposal. In recent months, both the Saratoga County and Saratoga Springs planning boards have issued positive advisory opinions related to the zoning change, which was recommended by the city’s Comprehensive Plan Committee. In all three deliberations, there were no dissenting votes. The proposal now rests with the Saratoga Springs City Council.

“We realize that the final decision on the zoning has not been made, but we could not pass on this opportunity,” Saratoga Hospital President and CEO Angelo Calbone said. “It’s not unusual for organizations to buy land in anticipation of future needs, especially if the property is strategically located.

“Our hope is that, ultimately, we will have a medical office center on this land,” he added. “We are absolutely convinced that providing healthcare services at this location is the best way to serve our community now and for the long term.”

***

About Saratoga Hospital: Saratoga Hospital is the Saratoga region’s leading healthcare provider and the only acute-care facility in Saratoga County. The hospital’s multispecialty practice, Saratoga Hospital Medical Group, provides care at more than 20 locations, ensuring easy access to programs and services that can have the greatest impact on individual and community health. Saratoga Hospital has maintained Magnet designation for nursing excellence since 2004. Through its affiliation with Columbia Memorial Health and Albany Med, Saratoga Hospital is part of the largest locally governed health system in the region. For more information: www.saratogahospital.org or www.facebook.com/SaratogaHospital.

# # #

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peter Hopper

Director, Marketing and Communications

518.583.8679

phopper@saratogahospital.org

Statement From Dave Evans On Behalf Of Hospital Neighbors

Displaying complete disrespect for the city review and approval process and the concerns of its neighbors, Saratoga Hospital has completed the purchase of 15 acres of residential land on which it plans to build a massive medical office building for which it has none of the necessary approvals.

The timing is notable. The Saratoga Springs City Council has not approved the controversial zoning change that is required for the project to go forward. No permits or approvals have been issued for the building itself. Yet Saratoga Hospital has chosen to move ahead in what appears to be an attempt to pressure the City into approving both the zoning change and the project despite strenuous neighborhood objections and significant negative impacts to a historic residential neighborhood.

This is a link to an article from the Saratogian that reports on the awarding of contracts and the most recent strategy for reopening offices in City Hall. It also has new renderings as to what the internal space will look like when completed.

As Readers may recall, I published a post regarding Robert Millis who is now the campaign manager for Kendall Hicks, the Democratic candidate for Commissioner of Public Safety. Mr. Millis had put up on his website a poster that promoted Antifa. As noted in that post, Antifa is a loose association of predominantly young men who advocate tactics that promote violent confrontations with their alt right enemies and that commonly also involves vandalism.

People on the left who I know refer to them as infantile provocateurs.

In response to that post someone calling themselves “King Rat” submitted the following comment:

Bob is one of the more interesting, smart and funny individuals in this town. He s not going to reply here because he’s probably having more fun just lurking over these comments.

Shortly later Robert Millis did reply posting the following comment:

Right up there with watching compilation videos of WalMart fights!

Mr. Millis does not seem to grasp that the candidate whose campaign he is now managing is running for Commissioner of Public Safety, a position that  oversees the city’s Police and Fire Departments and that what he says and publishes now reflects  on that candidate, Kendall Hicks

Humor in a political campaign is a risky business. One would hope that Mr. Hicks is not amused, but we haven’t heard from him yet on this.

Kendall Hicks is the Democratic candidate for Public Safety Commissioner this fall. His campaign manager had been Ellen Egger-Aimone but for some reason he has replaced her with Rob Millis.

Mister Millis has a Facebook page which includes this item.

For those of you unfamiliar with ANTIFA, here is an excerpt from Wikipedia:

The Antifa (/ænˈtiːfə, ˈæntiˌfɑː/)^[1] movement is a conglomeration of left-wing autonomous, militant anti-fascist^[7] groups in the United States.^[11] The principal feature of antifa groups is their use of direct action,^[12] with conflicts occurring both online and in real life.^[13] They engage in varied protest tactics, which include digital activism, property damage, physical violence, and harassment against those whom they identify as fascist, racist, or on the far-right.^[18]

Here is a terrific link to a routine by comic Trevor Noah that pretty much tells you what you need to know about Antifa.

I received this release from Kendall Hicks:

July 3, 2019

Limited Release: Party, Allies, Media From the Desk of Kendall Hicks

CAMPAIGN UPDATE: PHASE II BEGINS! ___________________________________________

With primary season now completed and the calendar turning to July, my team and I enter the next phase of the campaign for election to the office of Commissioner of Public Safety. I’m very excited for what’s ahead.

My election opponent is Ms Robin Dalton. While I yet to have the privilege of knowing her very well, my impression is that she is a gracious and decent person who, like me, wants to serve our community. We are well-served having citizens willing to step up to make Saratoga a better – and safer – place to live, work and play. I thank her for getting involved.

This campaign will be respectful, civil, and focused on policy. Specifically, we will offer creative ideas to preserve and enhance public safety for all the citizens, visitors and neighborhoods of Saratoga Springs. I am confident that Ms Dalton shares that same ambition and I look forward to getting to know her better in the process.

I am running because I want to serve our community, and because I have the skills and experience necessary to serve our community well. I know how to provide oversight to agencies and organizations. I know how to lead men and women. I know how to be accountable to stakeholders; in this case the people of our great city.

Our campaign is primed and ready. Whereas our startup months were devoted to organizing the people-power necessary to get on the ballot (petitioning, canvassing, filing, etc.), we are now geared toward making our case known to the voters by bringing our message to the public.

In shifting toward this part of the campaign cycle, we have added — and will continue to add — people that are well- versed in the skills every successful campaign needs, including outreach and communication. To that end, Mr. Robert Millis has accepted my charge of assisting in this transition by coordinating our resources (people and otherwise) and by developing & delivering our message to the citizenry. Please feel free to say ‘hello’ +/or get involved at his contact listed below.

This open and transparent letter serves as the first of those initiatives; stay tuned for more to come. It’s going to be a great campaign!

Kendall Hicks

Democratic Party Candidate

Commissioner of Public Safety for the City of Saratoga Springs Campaign Coordinator: Robert Millis 398Group@gmail.com

The website, Common Sense, Saratoga (CSS) published two stories on the city’s contract with the company SiFi. SiFi is to construct a citywide fiber optic network to connect our residential and commercial properties to the internet. The stories focused on what the author(s) allege were the gross inadequacies of the contract. I will be writing about the substance of CSS’s two articles in more detail in a later post but in this post my focus is on my attempt to find out who had produced these stories.

For me these CSS stories were immediately problematic because of the following issues:

• The articles had no author attribution
• Normally with blogs of this type, there is a dialogue box below them where readers may respond. Not in the case of CSS. This omission is an indication of the site’s approach to what it considers to be a “forum.” In the universe that the individuals behind this website live, there is no need to provide a vehicle to hear from its readers regarding individual articles.
•  The writer(s) regularly took contract items out of context or made regrettably inaccurate statements alleging, for instance, that things were not in the contract that in fact were.

With all this in mind I wanted to find out who wrote the articles and also, if the author was not an attorney, who assisted the author in evaluating the contract. To give the reader a flavor for the challenges of understanding the contract without the assistance of an attorney and/or a technical person, I offer this excerpt:

“Substantial Completion” means the point at which, the Core and Trunk of the System has been installed such that it Passes the addresses of each of the Primary Premises and the System is capable of providing Service to each such Primary Premises (but for the lack of a Drop) or four (4) years post Construction being commenced, whichever event occurs first; provided, however in the event SiFi Networks cannot install the Core and Trunk of the System or other necessary equipment or otherwise make the System available to a particular Primary Premises because of a lack of a right to access and use the Public Way due to the City not possessing the right, title, interest or authority to permit SiFi Networks to use and occupy the Public Way or other lack of access or right to access and use property, or if there would be an incremental material cost to access property or install the System such that the cost to do so would be at least twenty percent (20%) or more higher than the average cost to provide service to other Primary Premises within the Boundary, SiFi Networks shall not be required to make the System available to such Primary Premises, and Substantial Completion shall be deemed to be achieved notwithstanding the failure to Pass and make the Service available to such Primary Premises.  SiFi Networks shall provide the City with justification for any Primary Premises to which the System will not be available.

Mr. Boyd, in his later emails to me, asserted that one did not need a law background to understand this contract. He generously attributed to me the ability to read and understand it.  In fact I had to rely heavily on lawyers to work through the document.

It has been my experience, though, that issues that involve the law are often more complex than lay people commonly assume. Things that I thought were obvious became anything but when I have attended legal proceedings. Terms that I understood as having meaning in common parlance turned out to have very different meaning as regards statutes and regulations. There is also a major area of law that deals with implied assumptions which means that there is more to a contract than just its clauses.

CSS does have a “Contact” menu option where the reader is allowed to submit a comment to the managers of the site. I wrote them a brief note simply asking who the author/authors were and if an attorney was involved, the name of the attorney.

In a casual conversation with architect Jim Martinez, I learned that he had submitted several comments to CSS regarding problems he found with their articles but that his input had neither been published nor even acknowledged. Those who follow my site know that Jim’s comments on my site are always thoughtful and constructive. They are free of the kind of ugly invective that is too common to social media. I can only speculate that the reason they ignored his offerings was that they undermined the message they wanted the public to absorb.

The readers of this blog may recall that CSS was originally totally anonymous but after quite a bit of public criticism, the site published a list of three of the “Founders” for whom I had email addresses. Having, like Jim, received no reply to nor acknowledgement of my inquiry, I wrote to the founders, Gordon Boyd, Ann Bullock, and Bob Turner. I wrote what I considered a respectful note (See below) asking again for the author or authors of the article and the name of any lawyer who might have provided assistance. I pointed out that the site presents itself as being a public forum (from their About page):

“COMMON SENSE, SARATOGA will create forums and opportunities through which all citizens will be able to express the civic values embodied in our Mission Statement.” [JK: The site does not contain a mission statement]

I promptly received a note from Gordon Boyd. I think the tone and substance of Mr. Boyd’s letter is instructive and worth the reader’s time to read it. Mr. Boyd makes absolutely clear that:

1. He takes some pride in not reading my blog.

2. CSS has no intentions of publishing anything I might write to them.

I hope the readers of this blog find this response as disturbing as I do. There was a time, not too far in the past, when people valued listening to one another and showing the tolerance and respect that is a source of learning for all parties and that to behave otherwise was to bring some shame upon themselves. How disheartening that we live in a different age.

Ann Bullock is an attorney. Bob Turner is a professor of political science. Gordon Boyd is a successful businessman who has been active in city politics for almost fifty years. I expect that were you to engage them about our President and his base, they would offer contempt for those people as being rigid and mindless in their hostility towards anyone who disagrees with them and yet here we have these three individuals openly embracing the same qualities they abhor in others.

Many of the readers may be familiar with the term “Potemkin Village.” Miriam Webster defines it as “An impressive facade or show designed to hide an undesirable fact or condition.” According to Wikipedia:

The term comes from stories of a fake portable village built solely to impress Empress Catherine II by her former lover Grigory Potemkin during her journey to Crimea in 1787. While modern historians claim accounts of this portable village are exaggerated, the original story was that Potemkin erected phony portable settlements along the banks of the Dnieper River in order to impress the Russian Empress; the structures would be disassembled after she passed, and re-assembled farther along her route to be viewed again as if another example.

CSS is a “Potemkin Village.” Its purpose is a classic example of the worst aspect of social media. It is graphically well designed to impress those who go to their site. It asserts its values as openness and inclusion in the best tradition of our country.

As Mr. Boyd’s emails make clear with amazing candor, this site has no interest in such standards of fairness, however. In fact, CSS is an advocacy vehicle with a rigid and focused purpose. It is meant to attack and damage the reputations of the elected officials it sees as its opponents (enemies might be a more accurate characterization).  It consciously blocks voices that would undermine its mission.

What I find particularly distressing is that it resonates with so many people. When you attempt to point out the misrepresentations promoted by this site, there are many otherwise thoughtful people who respond very much like the Trump supporters. In the case of some of the Trump supporters, they know and acknowledge that he plays fast and easy with facts, but they embrace his goals and dismiss his behavior as incidental and unimportant. Similarly, the network of this group is either uninterested in any counter views at all or supports the narrative that the incumbents are part of an old guard that needs to be replaced and while the narrative of Gordon et al may be exaggerated, the underlying “truth” is correct.

The fact that the people behind this site refuse to participate in discussions that would provide a forum to critically assess their allegations should be a source of embarrassment. This is all about public manipulation and “winning”; whatever that means.

What a truly sad state of affairs.

My email exchange with Gordon Boyd and the founders.

A few further observations. Mr. Boyd asserts in the emails that the articles have been “peer reviewed.”

This is normally associated mostly with scientific articles. Fundamental to the concept of peer review is that those reading the papers can view who the reviewers were and decide whether those reviewing the work were both disinterested and qualified to pass judgement on it. Mr. Boyd would have strengthened his claim had he shared with the readers of his website who the reviewers were.

He goes on to refer to “the experienced business professional on our team.” Here again, the  “business professional” as well as the “team”  all remain anonymous.

In his second email he asserts: “Our CSS editorial committee is accountable for the articles we post.” The website has no masthead or other format stating that an editorial board exists let alone who is on it.

Subject: Articles On SiFi Agreement

June 16, 2019 at 1:52 PM

To: Gordon Boyd, Ann Bullock, Bob Turner

From: John Kaufmann

As my inquiries to Common Sense Saratoga have gone unanswered I thought I would contact you three directly as  you have identified yourselves as the founders of this site.  In promoting your site you have gone to great lengths to assert that it is transparent and that it invites community involvement and sets a priority of inclusion including those you may disagree with.  I would like to know:
1. Who wrote the two articles on the SiFi contract?
2. Who was the attorney who analyzed the contract and provided the critiques as published on your site?

Identifying authorship seems fundamental to transparency and accountability.  

Similarly, given the arcane nature of the language in the contract, a reader would reasonably want to know what expertise was brought to understanding and analyzing the contract.  

I think most people of good will would find my two questions both reasonable and courteous.  In fact, most people of good will would want the answers to the two questions.

Thank you in advance for answering.

John Kaufmann

Subject: Re:Articles On SiFi Agreement

June 16, 2019 at 2:46 PM

To: Gordon Boyd

From John Kaufmann

Subject: Re:Articles on SiFi Agreement

June 16, 2019 3:45 PM

The issue is not whether I am a journalist.  Your promotion of your blog admirably seeks to be an inclusive community forum that encourages all in our city to participate as part of a democratic dialogue.  Like you, I am a citizen of this city and as such I do not understand why I should be excluded from participating.

101 absentee and 5 affidavit ballots were counted at the Saratoga County Board of Elections this morning (Tuesday, July2).  With all votes now counted Ms. Morrison will be the candidate for Commissioner of Finance on the Democratic line in the November 5 general election.

Of the 106 ballots counted this morning 59 were for Patty Morrison and 47 for Michele Madigan.  1392 Democrats had voted on primary day, June 25, with 706 voting for Patty Morrison and 686 for Madigan.  Totals then are 733 votes for Madigan, 765 for Morrison, a difference of 32 votes. There are 6,731 registered Democrats in Saratoga Springs.

Final results will not be certified by the Board of Elections until next week but numbers are not expected to change.

Ms. Madigan will still appear on the November ballot on the Working Families Party and the  Independence Party lines as a candidate for Commissioner of Finance.

I reached out to Ms. Morrison and offered to post a statement from her but so far she has not responded.  If I receive a response I will be happy to post it.

Below is a statement I received from Michele Madigan:

I am saddened and disappointed to have lost the Democratic primary for Commissioner of Finance, due to low voter turn-out.  I wish to thank my many friends and supporters for their hard work in the face of a very difficult and at times an ugly primary campaign.

I am still on the general ballot in November on the Independence Party and Working Families Party lines, and while I would very much like to continue to serve all city voters – of all political parties – for another term, at this time the budget needs of the city are my priority. 

 must present the 2020 budget by the end of the summer, and get it adopted in November. Additionally, the city has several multi-million dollar matters I must continue to plan for: repairing and reopening city hall, the Loughberry Dam upgrade mandates, Fire/EMS needs of the Eastern Plateau, finding a permanent solution to code-blue and our homeless issues, and cybersecurity threats that plague cities daily – for starters.  I owe it to the taxpayers to focus on this city business. 

 I hope to serve another term and would be grateful for the support of all city voters, regardless of political persuasion, come November 5^th. This election is not about partisan politics or any particular issue; it is about prudently managing our city’s finances through challenging times.

People who have followed this blog will remember the debacle of the city’s handling of the “conversion” of the “barn” [Some would say large shed] to a house on Murphy Lane in 2016. The real estate agent who bought the barn applied to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a host of variances stating in their application that they were going to save the barn and convert it to a home. To do this they needed variances for everything from set backs to required parking spaces as it would face a narrow alley. In violation of the assurances they put in their application for variances, they tore the existing structure down anyway. In a particularly controversial action the structure is much higher than the original. This was a poster child case for the abdication of responsibility by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The city halted construction, but due to gross mishandling by the ZBA, its staff person, Susan Barden, and the Building Inspector at the time, Steve Shaw, the city ended up in court and in the end had to allow the project to go forward. For details do a search on this site for Murphy Lane.

Recently, the property was listed for sale for a whopping $722,000, and among the specifications in the ad was that the property has two parking spaces. The seller successfully received a variance to allow for only one parking space. The allotted space off the ally barely accommodates one car. There is nowhere on the property for a second parking space. Here are some pictures of the property. Note how narrow the alley is if a car is parked in front of the house making it difficult for the neighbor with the red vehicle to get out of their driveway, and these pictures do not show how narrow the ally becomes when snow piles up.

So it appears that the seller is misrepresenting the property. A neighbor who has been the victim in this project complained to the city about what appears to be an improper representation. The neighbor noted that the seller has laid pea gravel in front of the house which appears to be in the city right of way.

The Mayor’s office referred the complaint to Commissioner of Public Safety Peter Martin. The Public Safety office includes the office of code enforcement. I emailed Peter Martin on June 21 asking about the right of the owner to advertise the property as having two parking spaces and to lay stone in front of the property. I did not receive a response so on June 26 I wrote Commissioner Martin again asking if he would respond.

The Commissioner promptly responded to my second email with the following indicating that his department was going to put “No Parking” signs up:

Re: Murphy Lane

Saturday, June 29, 11:00 AM: MARCH FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE
Congress Park, Saratoga Springs, proceeding to SPAC entrance (Jazz Festival weekend!).
This is the Capital Region event for a nation-wide day of action called by Immigrant Justice Now.  Goals:
–End Child Separation.
— End family detention.
— Provide mental health support for the children and people the US has traumatized.
Contact Chloe Blanch: chloeblanch@gmail.com .  Facebook.
Co-sponsored by Saratoga Immigration Coalition.