Times Union Doubles Down on Its Attack On Michele Madigan

The Times Union’s apparent obsession with Michele Madigan has reached a new level of craziness. 

Commissioner Madigan has put off appropriating money in the capital budget for the greenbelt trail until the grants that the city has applied for are awarded.  Ms. Madigan has made it clear that she is in support of the project but as the chief financial officer of the city she believes that the city should not commit its own funds until there is a viable fiscal basis for going forward.  Given the costs and scope of this important project, Ms. Madigan’s deferral seems wholly reasonable.  I expect that she will be supported in her budgeting at Tuesday night’s meeting by a majority of the Council.  The Mayor has indicated that in spite of the fact that the grants remain an unknown she wants the city to move forward anyway.   

There is little question that the relations between Commissioner Madigan and Mayor Yepsen are not cordial.  It seems to me utterly unreasonable for the Times Union to cast this disagreement, though,  as driven only by petty conflict and to characterize Commissioner Madigan as the villain whose policies are put forward because she has (in the words of the Times Union) an axe to grind.

I have to wonder,  where is the Times Union getting their analysis from?

What follows is the Times Union’s editorial and Commissioner Madigan’s rebuttal.

The Spa City’s priorities

By TU Editorial Boardon October 27, 2016 at 2:37 AM

As the Saratoga Springs City Council prepares to vote next week on a budget that includes – and excludes – some noteworthy projects, council members might consider how this might read in, say, a promotional brochure for the city.

As things are looking, it will read like this:

“Saratoga Springs is investing in its historic City Hall, with almost $750,000 in renovations to the finance commissioner’s office that include a new private bathroom and break room for the staff and some ceiling work.”

With some tweaks to the budget, on the other hand, it could read like this:

“Saratoga Springs is investing more than $830,000 in its citizens and its future, starting work in 2017 on a Greenbelt Trail that will eventually create a 24-mile walking and biking trail. The first phase of this more than $16 million plan will be a downtown connector linking parts of the trail in the heart of the city. The local commitment will leverage millions more in state, federal, and private investment.”

We’re all for preservation of historic buildings like City Hall, but clearly, the Greenbelt Trail would be a boon for the city and its residents, and yet another attraction for the many tourists who visit in the summer. A feasibility study of the trail estimated that it would mean several million dollars a year in health and environmental benefits.

A committee comprising the mayor and representatives of the four departments, in fact, ranked the connector project seventh on a list of 22 capital projects; the work in the finance commissioner’s office ranked ninth. There’s nothing to say both can’t be done.

But Finance Commissioner Michele Madigan, whose job it is to merge the recommended capital budget with the proposed operating budget and present the council with a comprehensive budget proposal, has her own priorities – and they don’t include the Greenbelt Trail.

Her stated reason is that she can’t justify borrowing $833,000 unless the city knows if outside grants will come through. The city doesn’t expect an answer from the state until December, nor from the federal Department of Transportation until early next year.

We’re not buying it. It’s no secret that Ms. Madigan is at odds with Mayor Joanne Yepsen, for whom the Greenbelt Trail is a priority. This smacks of petty politics at their worst – a worthy community project that would benefit the entire city financially and in terms of quality of life sidelined by a single public official with an ax to grind.

Because of the quirks in Saratoga Springs’ system commissioner form of government, the budget is normally presented in its entirety for an up-or-down vote. Mayor Yepsen suggests that rather than force the council into an all-or-nothing decision, the operating and capital budgets be voted on separately. It’s a fair approach – one that would allow the council to tell Ms. Madigan to get her priorities straight.

Commissioner Madigan Responds

A recent Times Union Editorial took me to task over two of the 30 plus projects that currently sit in our Capital Budget (Finance Department Renovations at an estimated cost of $750K) and Capital Program (Greenbelt Trail Connector at an estimated cost of $2.3M, of which $833K would come from the taxpayers).  The Editorial reduced my entire proposed budget down to these two projects and pitted them against one another as if there is some kind of rift between departments, and giving the impression that the City Council must choose between these two projects.

The budget I proposed for the taxpayers and residents of Saratoga Springs consists of a $45M Operating Budget, an $8.4M Capital Budget, a Debt Service Budget, and the Water and Sewer Budgets.  I presented this “comprehensive budget” with no increase in property tax rates for the taxpayers of our city.   The various budgets include funds for many high priority projects, funds for essential city services, wages and benefits, infrastructure and safety needs. It is important to remember that adoption of the city’s budget will  require a majority vote of the Council.

I immediately responded to the Times Union’s first inaccurate article about the City Hall Finance Department renovations, which falsely claimed that I was getting my own private bathroom and kitchenette (for my exclusive use) with the following letter http://www.timesunion.com/tuplus-opinion/article/Letter-Maintaining-City-Hall-essential-9240182.php.  It seems I need to respond yet again.  I’ve been offering weekly public tours of the Finance Department since the publication of the first inaccurate article; many have participated in these tours and all have concluded that this space – which occupies approximately 1/3 of the first floor of City Hall – is “desperate” for renovations.

The $2.3M Greenbelt Trail Connector, which began under Mayor Scott Johnson in 2013 (and for which I’ve publicly stated my support, repeatedly, on the record), has always been presented to the City Council as a project that would be primarily funded by grants and that the City would not be expected to commit any of its own funds until this grant funding had been secured.  As a procedural matter during Council discussions of grant applications, I always ask for the record “is the City expected to provide any matching funds? If so how much, under what form, and does this obligate the City financially if we are successful at receiving the grant?” This is my duty and obligation as a Finance Commissioner exercising her fiduciary responsibilities to the City and its taxpayers.  Since its inception the plan has always been that we would not move forward on the Greenbelt Trail Connector project until the applied for grant funding had been secured – which is expected in 2017.  Therefore, this project is still in our 6 year Capital Program, which means we still plan to move forward with it, but is not included in the proposed 2017 Capital Budget.  It would be irresponsible for me to propose that we borrow funds in 2017  – and ask our taxpayers to make principal and interest payments on those borrowed funds during the year – for a project that may not even move forward until 2018 or thereafter.  I have stated, for the record, my support for amending the Capital Budget in 2017 if our grant applications are successful, as has Mayor Yepsen and at least two other Commissioners.  I do not anticipate that getting the required votes to make this change in 2017 if the sought after funds are secured will be a problem, but I do not speak for the entire City Council.

Furthermore, I have been discussing all of this with members of the Greenbelt Trail Committee and Sustainable Saratoga.  They understand what we are doing here and that this is not intended to jeopardize or delay progress on the Trail Connector.

This is merely an issue of timing. I say we shouldn’t borrow the funds until we actually know we need them. The “fiscally conservative” Times Union urges me to go ahead and borrow them now, and bake the repayment of them into the 2017 property tax rate, even if we don’t yet know we need them.  I say lets wait a few months and borrow the money when we know we need it – and know how much we’ll need – there is no guarantee we will receive the full grant amount. The TU says this means my priorities are skewed and that I am engaging in petty politics.  I say that this shows the TU editorial was written without a full understanding of the issues.

Another issue that needs to be considered is that the $2.3M cost estimate for the trail is just for one of eight phases of the proposed trail. The total cost is still not known, and has not been discussed with the City Council, but latest estimates are between $16.5M and $20M.  For a full overview of the proposed Greenbelt Trail and it’s cost please visit https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BxfrGj3VKIbcMVJIa09pZjROOFU/edit


17 thoughts on “Times Union Doubles Down on Its Attack On Michele Madigan”

  1. John, you ask “where is the TU getting its analysis?”. Well, the TU is clearly speaking with Mayor Yepsen as they quote her suggestion to separate the vote on the capital and operating budgets and we know they never bothered to contact Commissioner Madigan to comment on this. But then it is important to remember that the TU is still a Hearst newspaper. History buffs will recall that William Randolph Hearst is credited with being one of the originators of the practice of what came to be known as “yellow journalism” defined in Wikipedia as: Yellow journalism, or the yellow press, is a type of journalism that presents little or no legitimate well-researched news and instead uses eye-catching headlines to sell more newspapers.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Yepsen is a bully and let’s not forget she has been censored by this very Council for her unethical behavior in regards to a Hospital fund raising effort which she was found guilty of a serious conflict of interest….and she never explained her actions to the very public she claims to be sooo open with! Ms Madigan is a good and honest stewart of the public’s monies and should stay her course

    Liked by 2 people

  3. The article and the rest of the council meetings makes it very clear who the aggressor is and has been in this. Yepsen needs to cut out the sneak attacks and petty politics. Madigan would make a much better Mayor than Yepsen.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. For once I totally agree with merlin and P. Johnson (miracles do happen!). Commissioner Madigan has done an outstanding job. She always puts the interest of the tax payers first. Common sense financial responsibility.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. First, I’d like to note that my response to the current TU article was NOT allowed. All it said was the first column written by ‘reporter’ Wendy Liberatore was completely debunked not only by Michelle, but by the residents of Saratoga too, and that again, they owed Michele a retraction and a public apology for these constant hit jobs – and that I’ve bought my last copy of the TU because of it.

    It’s BLATANTLY obvious at this point that there IS a certain member of our council bringing this slander to the paper – and it’s NOT Michele. Or Chris. Or Skip. Or John. Guess who it is?

    It is also BLATANTLY obvious that these hits on Michele are because of the mayor’s ethics violation. She is now being investigated at the STATE level by the governors joint commission on public ethics (remember this was sent to the state by a majority vote of our city council).



    1. This is unfortunately a pattern for our illustrious mayor. She has been working hard to be nice to people lately. Beware! The nicer she is on the outside the more she is plotting and scheming behind the scenes. Transparency is a myth!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Commissioner Madigan is an excellent public servant. Do I always agree with her? No. Does it appear that the TU is not following due diligence? Yes. My hope is that this battle does not impede progress of important work to improve our fair city.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. This entire conflict between Yepsen and Madigan – both intelligent and well qualified council members – is absurd and needs to stop. It’s giving the City a black eye. Why hasn’t there been any efforts for these two city officials to reconcile their differences for the good of the citizens. Isn’t there an elder, someone they both respect, in the community that can broker a reconciliation? Please come forward if you read this and make it happen?


    1. “Why hasn’t there been any efforts for these two city officials to reconcile their differences for the good of the citizens.” No there is no one to step forward. The city democrats very often form a circular firing squad.


      1. It should be the responsibility of the city Democratic chair, Charlie Brown, to deal with this but he doesn’t seem to have the necessary skill set.


      2. This is easy to figure out. One is a democratic – the other is a McTygue. No further explanation is necessary.


    2. I’m sure it’s been tried. It’s not possible to reconcile with someone who has a policy of “I need to get them before they get me” – total paranoia


  7. This TU hatred is preplexing. Its almost like someone is feeding them nonsense, and playing them. What Madigan is doing here makes perfect sense to me. I’ve got friends that are involved in the trail effort, and they tell me she’s explained all this to them and they seem to be cool with what she’s doing. I think the mayor and her very good McFriends are just trying to make trouble for an exceptionally awesome finance commissioner, just to punish her.
    Actually, I think Michele Madigan does really good work for the city and us taxpayers and I wish the TU would look at the facts and sing her praises for all the good stuff she’s done.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. The more I think about this the more is seems logical that if anybody is doing any ax grinding in this budget process it would more likely be Yepsen, not Madigan . After all Madigan was involved in holding Yepsen accountable for her ethics violation in soliciting work from the hospital while the hospital had business pending before the council. So it makes more sense that it is Yepsen who is going after Madigan and has gone to the TU, and somehow managed to convince them that she and her greenbelt trail are the victims of the Finance Commissioner’s malice. Wow–Alice in Wonderland. The question is why does the Mayor with her history have such credibility with the TU that they would embrace her narrative without doing any checking.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. What’s really going on in McYepsen’s World? Well first of all she feels Michele is a grave threat to her agenda….which is?.. you ask…I don’t know does anybody? Her last stand against Madigan is her Charter change Committee she’s stacked it with 11 people who will try to change the form of Gov’t here to a Strong Mayor form with a weak Council she’ll break the city up in wards (this has done wonders for Albany, Schnectady, and Troy) this will destroy our very fabric….in other words she wants a BIG Gov’t here which will be more expensive than what we have now……this Yepsen thinks she’s worth six figures…what do you think??…… and by the way don’t be laying around Broadway trying to come up with an answer—-Good Morning Saratoga!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: