Saratoga Springs Politics

---

Dean Kolligian

1. What is your educational background?

• MBA / MHA, Towson University, Baltimore, MD 2002
• BS Kinesiology, Sports Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 2000

2.  What is your relevant professional background

• Vice President, Security Officer & Facilities Manager of Adirondack Trust Company, 2014 – Present
• President / Partner, McGregor Village Development Corporation / Mountain Ledge Limited Partnership, 2012 – Present

3. What volunteer activities have you been involved in in schools?

Youth Sports Coach (baseball, basketball, flag football), 2012 – Present

4. What other community activities have you volunteered in?

• Wellspring             01/2019 – Present
• New York State Troopers Signal 30 Fund BOT             09/2018 – Present
• Chair, Saratoga Hospital Golf Invitational 06/2017 – Present     
• Wilton Youth Baseball BOD & Coach 08/2012 – Present
• Town of Wilton Zoning Board of Appeals Member 06/2011 – Present
• Saratoga Hospital Foundation BOT 04/2008 – 12/2017
• Leadership Saratoga Advisory Board 06/2013 – 07/2018
• Leadership Saratoga Alumni Assoc BOD, President 05/2008 – 07/2018
• Alzheimer’s Association – Committee Member             06/2004 – 01/2013
• Alumni, Leadership Class of 2008

5. What prompted you to run for the school board?

• I am seeking a position on the Saratoga Springs City School District Board of Education in hopes of being able to make a difference. I am the father of 4 amazing children, at three different schools, within the district.  My wife, Erinn, has been a Coach for nearly 12 years and is currently the Assistant Coach for the Girls Varsity lacrosse team.  She is also a third-generation alum.  Our family has a lot invested in the education system and I would be proud to be a small part of the group that is tasked with overseeing that process.

6. Do you support the currently assigned armed School Resource Officers at the school?

• Yes, I absolutely support the assigned armed Resource Officers at our schools. Officer Davis and Deputy Mahan are tasked with maintaining the safety and security of thousands of students, faculty, staff and visitors that walk through our buildings each day.  Quite frankly they need additional support as well.  Whereas additional SRO’s may seem like a good option, we would need to fully understand the cost associated with this additional expense.  The active and retired law enforcement that were already employed by the district provide a most cost-effective measure for this support. 

7. Do you support finding a way to rearm the monitors at the schools?

• Yes, absolutely. For over 30 years these men and women were tasked with providing additional support for the safety and security of our school district. 

These retired law enforcement individuals are highly trained professionals that spent many years protecting and serving their respective communities.  Although they are retired from their law enforcement jobs, they are still some of the most qualified individuals to be placed into these positions.  I do support maintaining their high levels or education and training so that they are always up-to-speed with the ever-changing environments in our schools.

8. What plan do you see that would be most helpful in improving safety in the district? (Please distinguish between existing programs and additions.)

• I believe the program that existed before the current BOE vote to disarm the active and retired law enforcement personnel was the most helpful, and most cost effective, plan that was in place. Allowing active and retired law enforcement individuals to protect our schools promoted both fiscal and professional stewardship.  Additionally, I would promote on-going education and training of these law enforcement individuals.  There are also opportunities to collaborate with the Saratoga County Sheriff’s Department to provide similar services at a much less expensive option than the current SRO programs that are in place.    

9. How would you pay for any enhanced safety program (#6)?

• It must be noted that the program that was in place prior to the BOE vote to disarm the active and retired law enforcement staff was already included in the annual budget. These law enforcement officers had been district employees for many years, therefore no additional cost to the tax payers would be incurred.  I would promote research for grant opportunities to pay for their additional training and education. 

It is a proven fact that retired law enforcement individuals come with far less annual cost than those that are current, active-duty.  It can cost the district upwards of $75,000 per year to employ an active-duty police officer as an SRO.  However, a retired law enforcement officer collecting his / her pension is restricted in their annual earnings.  In the state of NY this is approximately $30,000 per year.  If we can provide them with annual education and training, the same as current law enforcement officers would receive, then the numbers don’t lie on what provides the best of both worlds.  A school protected with highly trained active and retired law enforcement personnel, promotes fiscal conservatism to our community. 

10. What are your thoughts regarding the “tax cap” as it affects public education?

• The current 2% tax cap is a necessary evil. Wouldn’t it be nice to not have to worry about going over budget for the public education of our future leaders?  However, this just isn’t possible.  The tax cap keeps our BOE and the Administration in check when it comes to preparing the budget for the following school year.  It must be noted though that when the need arises, the District Administration and the BOE must work together to ensure that the community understands the need for additional revenues.  This must be done through education and transparency.  There may be times when going “over budget” is necessary, but as long as the Administration and the BOE have worked diligently to make sure that there are no more cuts that can be made, the education of the community will be paramount in this process. 

11. What other thoughts do you have that you would like to share with readers of this blog?

• I believe that I bring a great deal of Board experience to the BOE. Although I do not have BOE experience, I have plenty of other Board Governance experience.  Over the past 16 years of living in this community I have been involved with more than 8 different Boards including; Wellspring, Downtown Special Assessment District, Town of Wilton Zoning Board of Appeals, Saratoga Hospital and the New York State Troopers Signal 30 Fund, all of which I currently serve.  In many of these I have also served in a leadership role such as; Chair, President, Vice President and Treasurer. 

I believe that our School District is great and I completely value and support the public-school education system.  Saratoga Springs City School District Is one of the best in the Capital District, supports student’s academic and athletic aspirations and has strong graduation rates.  We could certainly work to improve; classroom sizes, challenging educational opportunities (STEM and Honors programs) and our athletic and extra-curricular opportunities. 

12. If you have a website and / or Facebook page, what is the URL?

• I do not have a website or social media page dedicated to running for the BOE.

---

Ed Cubanski

1. What is your educational background?
2. 1984. 1984 – Norwich Regional Technical High School, CT – Electrical Trade/Secondary Education Diploma (won Electrical Skills USA CT competition in 1983 and 1984. Placed 3^rd nationally in 1983 and second in 1984).
3. 1984. 1988 – United States Coast Guard Academy – Bachelor Science – Electrical Engineering [One of the four Military Services Academies with Air Force Academy, US Military Academy (West Point), and US Naval Academy (Annapolis)]
4. 1984. 1992 – Naval Flight School Graduate (Wings of Gold)
5. 1984. 2004 – Embry-Riddle University – Masters in Business Administration in Aviation
6. What is your relevant professional background?Chief Operating Officer, American Red Cross – Eastern NY Region (2018-Present)
7. 1. Retired US Coast Guard Captain (O-6) in 2016 after 28 years of service (1988-2016)
8. 1. FEMA Type 2 Incident Commander (Qualification)
9. 1. FedEx Ground Operations Manager (2016-2018)
10. 1. Boy Scout Eagle Scout with six palms
11. 1. Rotary Paul Harris Fellow Recipient (2018)
12. 1. 51 st Recipient of Norwich Native Son/Daughter Award (2018)
       https://www.norwichrotary.org/SitePage/native-son-daughter-award
13. 1. Regional Response Team – 6, 7, and 8 Co-Chair at USCG Captain with EPA Representative (showcases collaborative ability to solve issues between diverse stakeholders – government, private industry, and non-profit entities).
14. 1. 1. As part of RRT-6 – revised 25-year Response Plan following the lessons learned of Deepwater Horizon
15. 1. What volunteer activities have you been involved in in schools?
16. 1. 1. 2008-2013 – Belle Chasse Primary (Elementary School) – Belle Chasse, LA (just outside of New Orleans). Treasurer managing $100,000 annual fundraising account and playground renovation lead.
17. 1. 1. 2013-2016 – Active leadership in Lordship, CT (Stratford) Elementary Schools to resolve issues brought up to PTA. Met as part of leadership team with Principal and Superintendent of Schools.
18. 1. 1. 2016-Present – Attend school events.
19. 1. 1. 2018 -Present – active attendance at BOE meetings starting in Nov 2018. Unable to participate early due to FedEx work shifts.

 

 

4. What other community activities have you volunteered in?Coach U8 soccer 1991-1992 – Pensacola, FL
5. 1. President, Belleau Woods HOA (60 homes), Alexandria, VA – 2001-2003
6. 1. 1. Established capital improvement fund
7. 1. President, Ortega Bluffs HOA (500 homes), Jacksonville, FL – 2004—2006
8. 1. 1. Established capital improvement fund
9. 1. 1. Championed update of HOA by-laws
10. 1. Coach U8 and U10 soccer – Belle Chasse, LA – 2008-2013
11. 1. Executive Vice President, Lordship Father’s Club – Stratford (Lordship), CT – 2013-2016
       http://www.lordshipfathersclub.com
12. 1. President, New London Maritime Society/Museum – New London, CT – 2016-Present
13. 1. 1. Non-profit museum that owns 3 lighthouses for public tours
14. 1. General Volunteer and Handyman – Saratoga Wilton Soccer Club – 2016-Present
15. What prompted you to run for the school board?I ’ll address this is two sections, 1) my Platform and, 2) my Persona and Demonstrated Actions.
16. 1. My Platform encompasses Safety, Education, and Advocacy based on my observations and action of the Saratoga School District. Don’t get me wrong, I believe our school district is very good, but is it the best that it could be?
17. 1. 1. First, Safety. Safety is an all-comprehensive program from physical security, identifying students and school adults that may be having issues that may negatively impact the school and those around them, counseling, and having the resources to resolve an active shooter in a timely manner.

However, the school district lacks in a “risk identification plan” from my research of open source material found on the school district website as well as having armed personnel to deal with an active shooter in less time than it takes the police to arrive 7.7 minutes after the call is made to them.

1. Second, Education. We need to have programs to address each level of student from those struggling to pass a class, those that do very well in school, to those that do not feel challenged in our school district.  We must provide resources to meet the needs of every student.There is some thought that kids that don’t feel challenged will leave the school and will go to a Charter School or private school.  Does that benefit every student?  Isn’t it better to have students that may be near the top of their school serve as role models for those ranked lower?  What about the benefit of a diverse education skill level work together on a class project?  Would such grouping benefit the student that learns a new study habit or how to gather information as part of a team project?  I firmly believe the answer is yes.Would smaller class size K-3, less than 20:1 improve the core math and ELA skills to have students flourish in grades 4-12?  The common-sense answer would state the answer is yes to reducing class sizes K-3 to less than 20:1.  The Center for Public Education studied 19 different class size programs throughout the country over the last 20-years and came up with the same verdict.

• Smaller classes in the early grades (K-3) can boost student academic achievement;
• A class size of no more than 18 students per teacher is required to produce the greatest benefits;
• A program spanning grades K-3 will produce more benefits than a program that reaches students in only one or two of the primary grades;
• Minority and low-income students show even greater gains when placed in small classes in the primary grades;
• The experience and preparation of teachers is a critical factor in the success or failure of class size reduction programs;
• Reducing class size will have little effect without enough classrooms and well-qualified teachers; and
• Supports, such as professional development for teachers and a rigorous curriculum, enhance the effect of reduced class size on academic achievement.http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/research/class-size-and-student-achievementThird – Advocacy. I have heard directly from teachers that many new programs that come out were not at the request of the teachers.  Additionally, many of that same group told me that it was rare for school administrators take action on resource requests and are provided the answers, “we cannot do that due to budgetary reasons.”  Additionally, the teachers also reported that most of the programs rolled out by Administrators relied mostly on the teachers training the teacher on the new program versus having a structured professional development program to teach the teachers as a group.I want to be part of a school board that listens to the teachers.  I would survey the teachers to solicit anonymous responses (if they so desire) to a list of 1) fill in the bubble questions, but also 2) provide space for them to write down their issues.  This written feedback is essential to gain the trust of the teachers that the school board is listening to them and can address their concerns, and maybe implement their solutions to a variety of school issues.I also want to be an advocate for the students.  I would query the parents to find out how many are receiving tutoring outside of school and why.  Having this data will truly measure the success of our schools because it will identify an uncaptured set of data that may show why so many kids are failing or not performing as well as they could because they don’t have the financial resources to pay for outside tutors.

1. Persona and Demonstrated Actions.
2. 1. My career accomplishments show that I lead people and identify issues that need resolution that either just occurred or have been languishing for a solution for years. (I can provide an extensive list that collaborated with various groups to achieve common good).
3. 1. I’ve volunteered in nearly every community I’ve lived. I’ve settled into my post-military career cadence now in Saratoga Springs and know what time I now have available to give back to the community.  I will have two daughters in high school next year and I want to help our eight community schools versus just the high school.I first started volunteering with my parents in a church group in Norwichtown, CT in the 1970s.  My volunteerism grew as I moved through Boy Scouts and my career with the Coast Guard.  Furthermore, once our children started attending school, I attended PTO meetings and heard of the issues that needed to be resolved.  My first such undertaking was helping renovate the Belle Chasse Primary School playground that was destroyed following Hurricane Katrina in 2006.  The playground sat idle for 2 years and in the end, we spent over $150,000 renovating the 4,000 sq ft playground with 30 cubic yards of rubber mulch, 200 ft of chain/rubber climbing devices, and replacing 5,000 board feet of lumber fastened with 10,000 screws.  Concurrently, I became treasurer and worked as part of the proactive PTO with the Principal to identify programs needed for the school.  Two such programs were an after school tutoring program and state test tutoring program.  Both were funded by the PTO.  Additionally, our PTO expanded Teacher Professional Development by bringing the instructors to the school to train 70+ teachers versus only sending 5 teachers per year to training.
4. Do you support the currently assigned armed School Resource Officers at the School?
5. 41019. Yes, I support SROs at our schools. Five of the 27 Active Shooter events in 2018 recently reported in the 2018 FBI report occurred at schools.
          https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-incidents-in-the-us-2018-041019.pdf/view
6. Do you support finding a way to rearm the monitors at the schools?The monitors at the schools are retired police and law enforcement officers with extensive experience that can benefit the safety and security of our schools.  There are several models available to mimic or create a hybrid model for Saratoga Springs School District.
7. What plan do you see that would be most helpful in improving safety in the district?  (Please distinguish between existing programs and additions).I would first form a TOGA School District Safety Committee meeting. The committee would be comprised of School Administrators, Teachers, other School positions (i.e. custodian as recommended in the Sandy Hook After Action Report, etc), a Social Worker and/or Mental Health professional, and one or two BOE members.  I would require that data be captured and discussed at the meeting (i.e. reported school bullying, kids requesting mental health or social worker appointments, kids failing classes, any other safety related incidents, reports of vaping, and many other pertinent data, any disgruntled parent issues, etc).  This data would be discussed and what concerns or additional resources are needed.
8. 1. This safety information is needed for budgetary reasons. There were several discussions during the recent 2019-2020 budget cycle stating that we need more social workers or mental health professionals.  There were statements each of those positions are overworked, which I do not debate.  However, there was no definition or context of the amount of overwork.  I would want a report with numbers of appointments, incidents, incidents resolved, incidents need further resolution, etc.  This will be real data to better inform the BOE in their duties to develop a budget with the Administration.
9. 1. The safety information is also needed for better risk assessment. When the safety data is broken down by school, grades, etc – it can better identify where the resources are needed to aid students, additional positions, etc.
10. 1. The data would also be made available in a less detailed manner at least annually so the parents can see the documented area of safety and risk concerns.
11. How would you pay for any enhanced safety program (#6)The Safety Committee should not require any additional funding. More analysis is needed to determine the cost for rearming the retired police officers as monitors to include shooting proficiency range costs, judgmental range costs, and other human resource training that is required of any employee of Saratoga School District.
12. What are your thoughts regarding the “tax cap” as it affects public education?There is not a limitless amount of money to fix every education issue. However, communities need to decide where it is best to spend tax money for the optimum return on investment.  I believe the return on investment (ROI) is better on education than post high school and adult programs.  There are many overtures for free college, but are kids getting the most out of their K-12 education?  Why is the graduation rate only 94% in Saratoga Springs School District?  What happened to that 6% that did not graduate?  Were any of those kids ever discussed in the School Safety Committee?  Would a Vocational School in Saratoga County provide an avenue for a high school degree for any of those 6% that did not graduate?
13. What other thoughts do you have that you would like to share with the readers of this blog?My mantra is to “challenge the status quo.” I’ve read many after action or post event reports in government, various volunteer organizations, FedEx, and the Red Cross that list lessons learned from a tragedy or incident.  The common failure is NOT turning those “lessons learned” into “lessons applied.”
14. 1. I want to leverage my personal drive, data analysis skill, and 42 years of leadership experience leading groups ranging from 3 to 2,600 people to resolve or mitigate issues that exist in the Saratoga Springs School District. My life and career resume have demonstrated my ability to resolve issues, many concurrently, in a timely manner.
15. If you have a website and/or Facebook page, what is the URL?Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/CubanskiforTOGABOE/?view_public_for=479917885875798
16. 1. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ed-cubanski-14a6821

---

Natalya Lakhtakia

1. What is your educational background?

I earned my bachelor’s degree in Psychology from The Pennsylvania State University in 2007.  I also minored in Spanish there.  I earned my master’s degree from The University of Utah in Speech-Language Pathology in 2010.

 

2. What is your relevant professional background?

I work for the public schools.  I am a speech-language pathologist and have spent my career working with kids/students of all ages – I have worked in Early Intervention, at the preschool level, with elementary, middle, and high school students, and with adult transition programs.  I am proud to work in special education and find great joy in helping young people communicate.

 

3. What volunteer activities have you been involved in in schools?

While working in the schools, I have mentored grad students, worked on a state-level assistive technology committee, and done volunteer work for fundraisers for the schools I have worked at.  My son is a toddler, and I am a volunteer reader at his daycare, where I am also a substitute.

 

4. What other community activities have you volunteered in?

I have volunteered at fundraisers for the non-profit I worked for, but have generally confined my volunteerism to the schools.  I know the school system well and have always felt best equipped to work on issues that I have a deep understanding of.  For example, I have organized and run special field trips for my students and I piloted a therapy animal program for my students.

 

5. What prompted you to run for the school board?

I have always known that at some point, I would run for the Board of Education. I started attending Saratoga Schools Board meetings in the fall, and was compelled to run after witnessing the open hostility that our administration and board received after the October 9th meeting.  I teach my son and my students to always be kind and treat others with respect. As I expect that from them, I embody those principles myself. I make and share my decisions respectfully, but I am not easily intimidated. I will always stick up for kids and what is best for them.

 

I am running for school board because I want our wonderful school district to get even better through:

 

EVIDENCE-BASED DECISIONS: Following research-backed practices that will most benefit our students, educators, and support staff.

COMMUNICATION: Increasing and improving the quality of communication with parents, students, and the community.

FULL SPECTRUM SAFETY: Ensuring our schools are a safe place for every single student to grow into well-rounded adults by addressing a range of issues including mental health, bus driver shortages, and bullying.

 

6. Do you support the currently assigned armed School Resource Officers at the School?

Yes.  I understand why NYSIR recommended adding a second SRO from the Sheriff’s department to cover the three schools outside of the city’s jurisdiction and I support both SROs and the work they do.

 

7. Do you support finding a way to rearm the monitors at the schools?

As the grounds monitors play a role in school discipline, I do not support them being armed.  I do not believe that lethal weapons should be a part of school discipline.

 

I also think that anyone who does carry weapons on the grounds of our schools needs to be an active duty law enforcement officer who receives ongoing training and certification.  This insures we keep our schools safe in all the ways that matter.  Part of protecting our schools is doing things properly, following procedure, and filing the right certifications and paperwork.  Having active-duty police also reduces liability to the district because oversight and training are done by the police or sheriff.

 

8. What plan do you see that would be most helpful in improving safety in the district?

We had a risk assessment in the fall and were told by the expert at the school safety forum that our schools are very safe.  I think we now need to focus strongly on prevention at many levels – whether we are talking about vaping, sexual misconduct, or students hurting themselves or one-another.  There is a marked increase in teenage anxiety, depression, and suicide across the nation – this absolutely breaks my heart.  We know that creating and maintaining a positive school climate helps every student feel that they are a part of something bigger than themselves – that they are not alone.  I want the schools and community to come together to help every student feel connected and cared about.

 

9. How would you pay for any enhanced safety program (#6)

I have attended every budget meeting open to the public, but our budget is extremely complex.  I do not have all the answers. I do know that if we identify concrete needs for more counselors, social workers, or security infrastructure, it is within this community’s power to vote for appropriate funding.

 

10. What are your thoughts regarding the “tax cap” as it affects public education?

It limits the ability of communities to decide for themselves how much they will spend on their schools and the new federal changes to state and local income tax have made it harder to evaluate.  For example, the tax cap formula doesn’t account for the sort of growth we have in Saratoga County, where we grow by 4-5% each year. Each year we are essentially getting less money because the formula does not account for our level of growth.  It would make more sense to have the property tax cap on the rate, not the levy.

 

11. What other thoughts do you have that you would like to share with the readers of this blog?

As a related services provider, I have a special view of the school system. I am an educator, but not a teacher. I manage cases, but I am not a case manager. I learn everyday, but I am not a student.

 

For almost a decade I have worked in special education with students at all levels with speech or language disorders (or both!). Working in special education means that I have a deeper understanding of what many of our students are experiencing. I perform evaluations, write IEPs, and understand the laws and policies that govern these documents. It’s my job to help students with special needs access the general curriculum. I work hard to help parents understand the services the schools provide. I think the board will benefit from my expertise in this area.

 

I have a modern view of technology and how we can use it to maximize the efficiency of our communication. I have never been an adult in a world without social media, which lets me relate to kids in a way that adults even a few years older than me cannot. Students trust me and want to talk to me. I am very capable with 21st century communications tools. This expertise will directly address concerns I have heard about the quality and consistency of communications from the board to its various stakeholders. I pledge to be an ally to teachers on this issue.

 

And last but not least, for everything I do now and everything I will do in the future, I will place children at the center of my decision making.

 

12. If you have a website and/or Facebook page, what is the URL?

My Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/NatalyaForSchoolBoard/

My website is https://natalyaforschoolboard.com

 

 

---

 

 

Shaun Wiggins

1. What is your educational background?

I have a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from Southern University. I am currently working on my Masters in Sustainability

 

2. What is your relevant professional background?

I have worked in senior management positions across public, nonprofit, and private entities. In my various roles I have led cross-functional teams, managed multibillion-dollar budgets, helped broker consensus from individuals with diverse opinions and backgrounds, and operated as a communications expert. 

 

3. What volunteer activities you been involved in in schools?

My primary volunteer activities have been in secondary education. I serve on the Board of Directors for the Martin Tuchman School of Management at the New Jersey Institute of Technology – in this capacity, I maintain the responsibility of developing and implementing the mission and vision of the school; I work with the National Urban League in developing technology programming for underrepresented students; and I provide internship opportunities for college students on a yearly basis.

 

4. What other community activities have you volunteered in?

I have worked with a community church in supporting a gun buy-back program across Saratoga county; I support fundraising activities for Caroline Elementary.

 

5. What prompted you to run for the school board?

I witnessed a series of issues in our school system that I found to be personally problematic. The first being the disarming of personnel whose primary focus was to protect students from armed threats. The second being the increase of student-to-teacher ratios at Caroline Elementary. The third issue being the School Board’s less than satisfactory approach to communicating with parents. Finally, the lack of transparency in the School Board’s budgeting process.

 

6. Do you support the currently assigned armed School Resource Officers at the School?

I absolutely support armed School Resource Officers across out school district.

 

7. Do you support finding a way to rearm the monitors at the schools?

If elected, I would support armed School Resource Officers first. If that is not achievable because of budgetary constraints, I do support rearming the school monitors, but they must report to the Saratoga Springs Police Department and/or the Saratoga County Sheriff’s Department to ensure they are receiving the most up-to-date training. Certification in weapons is not sufficient.

 

8. What plan do you see that would be most helpful in improving safety in the district?  (Please distinguish between existing programs and additions).

If elected, I would advocate to ensure that the Saratoga Springs School District develops and implement a comprehensive approach to school safety. My focus is not solely on having armed personnel. While that is critical, we do need to have “system” in place. The National School Boards Association lays out an excellent framework…we do not need to recreate the wheel:

 

ESSENTIAL TRAINING

This observation leads to the next burning issue in school safety: training. How your staff is prepared to respond to a threat or incident in school is not just a perennial issue; it remains the premiere issue for district leaders wanting to keep schools safe.

Yet evidence suggests many schools still fall short in providing this essential training. Patrick Fiel, founder of PVF Security Consulting and former chief of security for the Washington, D.C., school system, has observed this problem firsthand.

For example, school personnel have been told repeatedly of the importance of limiting outsider access to schools, he says. Yet, in conducting security audits at schools, “we find that we can still walk through side doors, back doors, cafeteria doors, gym doors”—school entrances that are unlocked, not closed properly, or propped open.

To avoid such security lapses, it’s essential that district leaders insist upon a well-conceived schedule of professional development on school safety practices, with that training reinforced by regular drills and brief refresher courses. These courses can be as simple as a five-minute “what if” role-playing exercise during staff meetings.

District leaders also need to recognize why schools shortchange training: School administrators are overworked, funding and time are in short supply, and there’s a lack of urgency in schools that have had the good fortune to avoid a serious incident. School boards need to make sure these obstacles are overcome.

“School people make up excuses,” Fiel says. “They say their budgets have been cut—or their schools are in good neighborhoods. But one of the things I say when I’m in front of a school board is that they’ve got to make security training a top priority—period.”

SMART TECHNOLOGY CHOICES

Technology plays a pivotal role in school safety. Metal detectors may serve as a deterrent to students bringing a gun to schools, and surveillance cameras can help identify those involved in vandalism, fights, or other incidents.

If school officials are looking for technology to keep schools safe, Fiel suggests they start with one piece of technology that’s decidedly old-school: a good classroom door lock.

The Sandy Hook Advisory Commission, which looked for lessons in the 2012 school shooting that left 26 dead, noted that, in its research, “there has never been an event in which an active shooter breached a locked classroom door.”

But the right lock is needed—one that is easily locked from inside the classroom without a key or, even better, locks automatically when closed. Campus Safety magazine has reported that, after asking teachers to react to a scenario where they hear gunfire, “we often see that it takes the employee between 30 and 40 seconds to find their key and lock the door.”

EAR TO THE GROUND

Security personnel have long understood the value of building relationships with students to monitor gossip about threatened suicides, bullying, or a student threat to bring a gun or bomb to school.

The latest twist on this practice, however, is found in Florida’s Orange County Public Schools, which is using software to monitor student posts on social media.

The district pays $18,000 annually for software that allows officers to scan for social media keywords associated with cyberbullying, suicidal thinking, or criminal activity. The software flags worrisome student posts for officers to examine for a real threat.

Such monitoring is potentially controversial, so school officials took time before the program began to explain their intentions and the scope of monitoring to the community, says Michael Eugene, chief operations officer for the district.

Only a handful of officers are authorized to monitor social media, and only public postings are examined, Eugene says. Private communications are not accessed.

“Not everyone is in favor of school districts monitoring social media,” he says. “So this is an important conversation to have clearly with parents so they understand why it’s important to utilize a tool like this.”

The district’s protocol is to respond immediately to troubling posts, Eugene says. So, it’s not uncommon for school police to visit a student’s home at night to investigate a suspected problem.

“It changes how you think about the day,” he says. “You don’t wait until the next morning to deal with an issue. You hit it first thing, as we don’t want the issue to come back to school.”

UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF SROS

You’ve seen newscasts of school-based police throwing students to the floor or handcuffing students so young that the restraints slip off their tiny wrists.

Such incidents have fueled one of the most significant recent trends in school safety: a rethinking of the role of school-based police.

According to the National Association of School Resource Officers (NASRO), the goal of school-based police or school resource officers (SROs) is to ensure school safety—not school discipline.

“Being a SRO is about community-based policing, not about how many kids you can arrest or how many crimes you can solve,” says NASRO Executive Director Mo Canady.

In addition to looking out for potential safety issues, SROs should be getting to know the students they seek to protect, he adds.

“By building relationships, you begin to collect information. It’s not about kids becoming a snitch, but it’s about good relationships where young people get concerned about some issue or something they saw on social media and they come talk to the SRO.”

For district leaders, one of the most important steps they can take is to ensure that SROs are properly trained, understand their role, and have the skills and temperament to interact with young people and de-escalate conflict, Canady says.

While SROs will respond to criminal activity, if asked to intercede in a disciplinary issue, they should know to refuse—and to point out correctly that student misbehavior is not a law enforcement issue, he adds.

“SROs are not there to mete out school discipline. If SROs are writing tickets to students for being late to class, that’s insane.”

WATCH THE FRONT DOOR

When a gunman was unable to open the locked front doors at Sandy Hook Elementary School, he shot his way through a glass panel at the entrance to gain entry.

The incident highlights an issue much on the minds of school safety experts: How do you screen—and contain—arriving visitors before they gain access to school hallways?

We’ve already talked about keeping school doors locked. So, let’s focus on where you want visitors to enter: the main entrance.

The thinking today is that, if possible, this entrance should have a vestibule with two door entrances: one to the school, the other to the front office. Both should be locked. (Some schools are going the extra mile and installing ballistic plastic over glass panels to make them more difficult for a gunman to shoot his way through.)

The entrance also should be equipped with an intercom and camera so school staff can visually verify a visitor’s identity before granting entrance to the school. Some schools opt for a visitor management system to check identification to determine if a visitor is a registered sex offender, has a criminal record, or is otherwise barred from the campus.

Nobody should be permitted inside until screened.

No one wants to turn a school into a fortress, but it’s important that staff and students understand the importance of access control, Trump says. He’s seen instances where visitors hit the intercom at an entrance and are granted entry without being asked to identify themselves—or a student is buzzed in and holds the door for a nearby adult.

Even the most rigorous of security precautions won’t guarantee that a threat can be kept out of a school, but there is evidence that a properly designed front entrance—responsibly monitored by staff—can slow down a gunman and possibly save lives

“We’re not likely to stop a determined individual,” Fiel says. The goal is to buy time for staff to be notified of the threat, the school to go into lockdown, and police to arrive. “We want to delay the individual.”

EVALUATE LIKELY RISKS

Nearly two-thirds of U.S. schools regularly conduct some form of “active shooter” drill to teach students and teachers how to react to an armed intruder.

Unfortunately, far fewer schools prepare for the more common scenario: the appearance of a parent, intoxicated or without custodial rights, who wants to pick up his child and becomes agitated and disruptive when the request is refused.

“The key thing is to understand what your security needs are,” Fiel says. “You must do a risk assessment. That’s the key to starting everything.”

Statistics put the risks in some perspective. For every school-related shooting, there are nearly 10,000 violent assaults, including rape, assault with a knife, sexual assault and violent harassment, beatings, fights, and robberies.

This doesn’t include the millions of students who are bullied each year.

“There’s been a tunnel vision focused on active shooters,” Trump notes. “That’s taken the eye off the ball for more common, day-to-day school security issues. Not enough conversations on school safety are talking about the rape that could happen under the stairwell or the importance of supervision during class changes to prevent violence.”

A risk assessment, conducted in consultation with security professionals, is designed to identify the potential safety risks of a campus, analyze the campus’ vulnerabilities, and point to strategies to improve safety, Fiel says.

What may result are decisions as obvious as expanding the presence of teachers and other adults to monitor hallways, restrooms, and stairwells during class changes, a simple step that can have a greater day-to-day impact on safety than anything else school leaders do.

“Sometimes it’s the simple tools, a focus on the basic safety risks, that work,” Fiel says.

In the end, the lesson for district leaders to learn is that—if school safety is a true priority, not just a nicely worded goal—they can make their schools safer.

“We reduced [school-based] crime while I was in Washington, D.C., and we had something like 200 gangs we dealt with every day,” Fiel says. “If you pay attention to the basics, the fundamentals, and you carry through with them, you’ll have safer schools.”

 

9. How would you pay for any enhanced safety program (#6)

I have reviewed the current school budget. At this time, I am not knowledgeable enough to intelligently and accurately state how an enhanced safety program will be paid. With that, if elected, I would take a “back to basics” approach, meaning that the entire school budget must have a teacher-student focus. Once the School Board has ensured that proper student-teacher ratios are established and sufficient school security measures are in place and properly budgeted, then the remaining budget can be allocated for all “supporting” efforts. This will require a change in how the budget is allocated. This will require a hard look at the current budget with an eye to cost-cutting. My position is that everything would be on the table for cost cutting consideration.

 

10. What are your thoughts regarding the “tax cap” as it affects public education?

I oppose a tax cap. Costs continually rise and we as citizens must step up to defray those costs through additional taxes.

 

11. What other thoughts do you have that you would like to share with the readers of this blog?

The Saratoga Springs School District provides a quality education for our students. Part of the attraction for businesses and talent to live in this district is the fact that we have among the best schools in the state of New York. It is critical that we ensure our school district changes with the times by ensuring that we have enough funds to keep our schools highly ranked and that we are properly allocating the funds to the core of our education system — the students and teachers. This means ensuring that we have well paid and well compensated teachers. This also means that we have well-funded security measures that foster a safe and secure environment.

 

12. If you have a website and/or Facebook page, what is the URL?

https://www.facebook.com/ShaunWigginsForSaratogaSchoolBoard/

 

 Dr. Brueggemann’s web site includes the following:

 

The relevant text which is highlighted states:

“It is their (the insurance carrier’s) considered view that Ground Monitors should not be rearmed.”

 This is simply false and easily documented.  There is a video of the meeting in which the representative of New York State Insurance Reciprocal addressed this issue which can be viewed at https://youtu.be/zg3avEzGjl4 .  If you move the pointer to 1:12;54 you will hear the representative for the insurance carrier say regarding arming the school monitors:

 “Whether they do or don’t, is a question for the community and the school board, and as a risk manager, I’m going (to) lean either way.“  

 It is important to note that the insurance representative expressed concerns about the potential liability the school would take on in arming the monitors and he emphasize his concern that the monitors be thoroughly screened and that the school would need to insure that there was on-going training to insure their readiness.  It is absolutely crystal clear, however, that he was careful to avoid committing to taking a position and that he left that decision to “the community.”

What I find particularly disturbing is that the screen shot above was taken from Dr. Brueggermann’s Facebook page yesterday (April 20, 2019).  This is important because Dr. Brueggemann has been advised about this issue and, as will be documented below, is fully aware of what the insurance representative said, and yet he has failed to amend his Facebook page to correct his erroneous representation of what the insurance representative said.

 My Odd History With Dr. Brueggemann

Earlier this year I contacted John Brueggemann to interview him about his candidacy for the Saratoga Springs School Board.  As I often do, in order for him to feel comfortable, I told him that our conversation would be off the record.  

I honored that commitment and readers of this blog will note that until this post his name barely appeared on my blog site let alone any discussion of what he shared with me in our phone conversation.  

As he has sent me an email (see below) drawing from our phone conversation I no longer feel bound to keep that conversation confidential.

In our phone conversation, Dr. Brueggemann had told me that the representative of the school’s insurance carrier had recommended the school both utilize the services of two School Resource Officers (SRO) and that the school district not allow the monitors to carry fire arms.

I had no reason not to believe Dr. Brueggemann so in the first of the four posts I wrote on the issue of arming monitors I repeated what he had told me.

I subsequently viewed the video of the meeting where the insurance representative spoke (see above) and realized that what Dr. Brueggemann had told me was, to be generous, not accurate.  As previously noted, while the insurance representative did recommend the two SROs, he had been very careful not to take a position on the issue of arming monitors one way or the other.

So on March 22nd I published a correction under the title “Two Corrections To Guns Or No Guns Part #1”. The post was very brief and simply stated that the insurance rep had not recommended disarming the monitors.  Again, in order to honor my commitment to Dr. Brueggermann, I attributed the source of my misinformation only to a “candidate for the school board.”  No name, not even a gender.  

On March 25th Dr. Brueggemann emailed me (see complete email below).  

He asserted that he had become the targets of internet trolls because of my blog.  I was stunned, in light of the care that I had taken to avoid referencing him as my source of misinformation

He went on to chastise me for the correction I had published (a correction made necessary by his misrepresentations to me) for my apparent failure to understand the obvious.  He wrote:

“We do not have armed grounds monitors and they (the insurance carrier) do not recommend rearming them. That is a simple fact, which I tried to convey to you, that is somehow obscured in all the words you have written.”

 Dr. Brueggemann seems unable to grasp the distinction between the insurance representative declining to recommend arming the monitors (which he did) as opposed to the representative taking a position opposed to arming them (which he didn’t).  

As Dr. Brueggemann is a professor of sociology and, based on my conversations with him, an intelligent and well read individual,  I am unable to understand this.

In fact his email contains a fragment of the transcript from the meeting at which the insurance representative spoke and it contains the rep’s refusal to commit on how the school system should decide on arming the monitors.  How he can send me this transcript with the rep’s actual words and continue to assert that the rep holds a position on whether or not to arm the monitors is truly perplexing.

The following is the unedited email that Dr. Brueggemann sent me:

Subject: RE: First Post Re Saratoga School District Armed Staff Issues

From: John Brueggemann

To: John Kaufmann

Date: March 25, 2019

John, I was very surprised by your second post regarding NYSIR. NYSIR presented the BOE with a series of recommendations. Rearming the grounds monitors was not one of them. We do not have armed grounds monitors and they do not recommend rearming them. That is a simple fact, which I tried to convey to you, that is somehow obscured in all the words you have written.

During the 30 plus minutes I spent speaking with you I mentioned the importance of expert supervision, training related to working with young people and special needs students, and ongoing active shooter training. So far, you haven’t mentioned any of these things. Nor the fact that no real experts recommend arming security guards without those conditions.

Below is a transcription of the BOE meeting when the NYSIR official spoke and then your words characterizing what he said?[sic] Do you really think you gave an accurate summary? I do not. Indeed, I think it is highly misleading. I don’t care about the names I’m being called on social media based on your blog. Trolls will be trolls. But I believe you’ve mislead the public on a key issue. I’m glad you provided the link. Anyone who watches it will know. But I’m afraid most people won’t go to the trouble. 

Sincerely, John

“The NYSIR perspective would be looking at it also from a liability standpoint and the different perspectives. To me, it’s a governance issue, if the Board makes a decision to disarm these security guards. You have these full-time School Resource Officers armed in the building, plus you still have your security personnel that are in the building. Right? They are there to provide assistance and like you say they are highly trained ex-law enforcement professionals in your building. So there are a number of them who can provide assistance in the event of an emergency situation. 

If the school district were to say ‘yes, we need to have them armed,’ I would want to have, as the assistant chief said, top notch requirements in place for them in everything that they do when it comes to weapons controls and weapons procedures to the point where the full-time law enforcement people have in place.

From a liability perspective there is a lot that can go wrong and the school district in hiring those individuals is taking on that liability. So, from a risk management perspective, that is how I would look at it.

Whether they do or don’t, is a question for the community and the school board, and as a risk manager, I’m going lean either way. [JK:My emphasis] You don’t have them, are you still safe? You look pretty good with a school resource officer and the trained staff that you have in place right now that  understand what their role and responsibility is. And like I say, when we did the assessment, we were outside the school at the beginning of the school day for the morning arrivals and there were school staff everywhere doing a fantastic job, controlling the grounds, covering a high impact time of day. You know, a lot of bodies outside that are potential targets.

So that is the perspective that NYSIR would bring to it, looking at it from a liability perspective, saying if you’re going to do it, there are a lot of controls you need to have in place, you know, at the high school.” 

---

[JK: This is from my correction post which he included in his email] One candidate for the School Board told me that the risk of arming the monitors was such that at the recent community meeting on safety, the District’s insurance agency had recommended against it. This turned out not to be true. The insurance representative instead told the audience “I can lean either way…..It’s a governance issue.” Here is a link to the video of the meeting. The insurance representative can be heard discussing the issue between 1:11:33 and 1:13:33

 

 

The Times Union and the Gazette ran stories about the school board candidates’ fund raising efforts.

The Saratoga Parents for Safe Schools raised $33,000.00.  They have spent over $17,000.00.  They used the money to do automated calls to district residents and to purchase lawn signs.  Their endorsed candidates are Dean Kolligian, Ed Cubanski, and Shaun Wiggins.

John Brueggemann raised over $4,700.00.  He spent nearly $1,500.00 so far.

Connie Woytowich, Heather Reynolds, and Natalya Lakhtakia raised under $500.00.

Candidates are only required to file financial reports if they raise over $500.00.  The Gazette reported that district officials did not recall a time before this when candidates had to file financial reports.

Brueggemann and Reynolds both have been critical of the candidates accepting money from the Saratoga Parents for Safe Schools because they believed it would undermine the candidates’ independence.

This criticism seems to me to be opportunist by playing on people’s appropriate resentment about groups funding candidates in general.  Normally such contributions come from business groups with financial interests in influencing government policies.  In the case of these school board races the money is not coming from big corporations but from people who support using armed monitors as a security resource in protecting schools from shooting incidents.  

Bethesda Episcopal Church has launched an ambitious project called Mercy House. They hope that it will be a comprehensive community resource.  Below is a rendering of the proposed facility along with a press release describing their plans.

April 14, 2019                                                                                     .

Saratoga Springs — Bethesda Episcopal Church of Saratoga Springs has created Mercy House of Saratoga, Inc., a new, non-denominational, non-profit that will provide temporary residences for a wide range of needy people.  Housing will be offered in partnership with several local agencies in a new building to be constructed next to the church on Washington Street.

Those to be served include victims of domestic violence and their children, homeless military veterans including women with children, people living with mental health and substance use diagnoses, and race track backstretch workers who are in recovery from physical injury or substance abuse.

Partner agencies include the Backstretch Employees Service Team (BEST), Transitional Services Association, Veterans and Community Housing Coalition, and Wellspring (domestic violence).  These agencies will identify and refer individuals and families — people already in our community who are homeless or at risk of becoming so.

A fifth organization, In Our Name, will offer a “pay as you are able” café for guests and the community, a center for discussion and discovery, employment readiness and socializing.

A New Four-Story Building

Mercy House will offer housing in a four-story, 30,000 square-foot building that will be constructed at 26-28 Washington Street, just off Broadway in Saratoga Springs.  The building will also serve as the parish house for the church.  Construction for the $9 million building is expected to begin by the end of 2019.

“Mercy House was formed to further our religious mission to help people in need,” said Darren Miller, Bethesda’s Senior Warden.  “When the Bethesda congregation began planning our new parish house, we saw the opportunity to do more for the Saratoga community.  Mercy House will offer hope to people who are facing a tough stretch in their lives. The downtown location offers easy access to bus lines, a supermarket, a community center, employment opportunities, and a primary-care health facility.”

“Dignifying humanity has always expressed the heart of the church’s mission,” stated The Very Rev’d. Marshall J. Vang, Bethesda’s Interim Rector. “What we are creating is more than a collection of stone and mortar. Mercy House will be a place of renewal and hope.”

The first floor of the new building will be primarily dedicated to Bethesda’s parish activities and offices.Residents and housing partners will have access to first floor Bethesda parish rooms for events, counseling and meetings, such as Alcoholics Anonymous, with which Bethesda enjoys a 75-year relationship.

The upper floors will include 18 apartments(1- 2- and 3-bedrooms) plus communal space to accommodate up to 47 individuals.  There will be a two-bedroom apartment for a full-time, on-site manager employed by Mercy House, and a digital security system will assure resident safety.

“Feeling safe at home is something we often take for granted,” said Maggie Fronk, Executive Director of Wellspring. “As Wellspring works with families that have experienced abuse, a key factor in building a future free of violence is the ability to find a safe, affordable place to live. Domestic violence is the primary cause of family homelessness in Saratoga County. Bethesda Episcopal Church’s housing program will afford individuals and families much needed affordable housing with access to employment opportunities, public transportation and services.”

“The importance of a caring community as integral to the healing process cannot be overestimated,” said Paul Ruchames, Executive Director of BEST.  “BEST is honored to be a part of this project and pledges to do all possible to help it come to fruition and later, to thrive.”

“Transitional Services Association is excited to be a part of this collaboration with the Bethesda church,” said Sybil Newell, executive director. “For the past 40 years we have provided housing and supportive services to individuals living with mental health and substance use diagnoses in Saratoga County. One of our biggest struggles has always been finding safe and affordable housing in the Saratoga Springs area that is also accessible to resources and services. The proposed project- Mercy House- will fill a great need in our community to provide housing to vulnerable individuals, in an optimal location.”

“We’re  excited about our partnership with Bethesda Episcopal Church to provide stable, supportive and affordable housing to our veterans, said Cheryl Hage-Perez, Executive Director of Veterans & Community Housing Coalition.  “This partnership will create an opportunity for single, homeless, female veterans with children to remain stably housed while receiving the support services they need to live a productive and successful life in their community.  This project will provide the only services for this target population in our area.”

“Food For Thought is a café based upon the mantra of ‘Feed, Teach, Employ, House’ said Frank Zarro, In Our Name’s coordinator.  “Each of these critical human needs will be addressed within the walls of the Bethesda annex. Meals will be served every day, on a pay-what-you-are-able basis.  Everyone will be included and no one will be turned away. We also hope to help Mercy House’s guests to develop job-ready skills and habits to support the hospitality community.”

“Mercy House builds on Bethesda’s long-standing commitment to helping people in need, including establishing the Home of the Good Shepherd in 1871 and sustaining it for more than a century,” Miller said.

“Homelessness in Saratoga County is a byproduct of our community’s economic success over recent decades,” said Gordon Boyd, President of Mercy House.  “We will provide a resource to meet a major share of the need, but the work of others must continue and grow.  Like other challenges Saratoga County has met over the years, when everyone gets involved, good things happen.”

Mercy House was incorporated in October 2018.  Its Board of Directors includes both members of the parish and of the outside community.  Assistance provided at Mercy House will be non-denominational.  Mercy House is planning a campaign to begin in the coming months to raise the additional capital needed to begin construction.

Republican candidate for Saratoga Springs Finance Commissioner Rob Barile’s petitions were successfully challenged by Bill McTygue.  The result is that he will not appear on the ballot in November on the Republican line (he will still appear on the Conservative line) and whoever wins the Democratic primary will in all likelihood be the next commissioner of Finance.

As Bill McTygue has been heavily involved in Patty Morrison’s campaign, I contacted her.  Her only response was “no comment.”

I contacted Matt Hogan, chair of the Saratoga Springs Republican Party.  He offered the following:
“I haven’t been able to confirm that his petitions were disqualified.  If they were, I can only say that these things are best decided by the voters rather than the lawyers.”

I contacted Michele Madigan, the current Commissioner of Finance, who is Ms. Morrison’s opponent in the Democratic Primary.  She told me, “I considered challenging his petitions but decided against it.  The public is best served when they have a choice of candidates.”

I heard about Ashton on the BBC Radio 4.

It is hard to believe that School Board members, in supporting adding an SRO to the Middle School while opposing the rearming of the grounds monitors, actually thoughtfully reviewed the training and background standards of SROs in making this decision. In light of the minimal training and experience requirements for SRO positions, the choice to use more expensive SROs rather than to rearm the monitors seems to have been based on an exaggerated narrative regarding the expertise of the School Resource Officers (SRO). 

From all reports, we are fortunate to have two excellent School Resource Officers (SROs) working for the Saratoga Springs School District.  We have a policeman from the Saratoga Springs Police Department at the High School and a sheriff from the Saratoga County Sheriff’s Department at the Middle School.

It is important to have a realistic assessment of what the qualifications for these positions are, however.

There are currently no standards, no minimum training requirements, nor certification process for SROs in New York State.  The only requirement is that they be an active duty law enforcement officer.  Any additional qualifications and  training  requirements are entirely up to the law enforcement agency employing the SRO.

As the correspondence I have added at the end of this post shows, the National Association of School Resource Officers recommends that active law  enforcement personnel who want to become SROs are only required to participate in a three day training program they offer.

I am not familiar with  the Saratoga County Sheriff Department’s requirements for training SROs, but I did get an email with information about the Saratoga Springs Police Department’s requirements from Public Safety  Commissioner Peter Martin which can be found at the end of this post.

According to Commissioner Martin the SRO employed by the Saratoga Springs Police Department participated in a  38 hour training program.  The officer assigned to the High School is a patrolman which is the lowest rank in the Saratoga Springs Police Department.

The required training for an SRO position whether the standard be what NASRO uses or that which the Saratoga Springs Police Department uses is pretty modest.  This raises the question of who is better prepared, an entry level law enforcement officer with one week of training or a twenty year veteran of law enforcement who has been through years of active training including active shooter training.  As the training for SROs is provided by the state police academies, the cost would probably be modest to provide this training to retired veteran officers such as the grounds monitors.  Adding this SRO training to a retired law enforcement officer who has had the benefit of decades of on the job experience could just be a better, more cost effective alternative to a much higher paid but less experienced SRO.

In correspondence  attached below, the executive director of NASRO cites some variables for consideration if retired law enforcement officers were to return to active duty to become an SRO.  He would want to know how long they had been retired, whether they were physically fit, and whether their skill sets were up to par. 

It should be acknowledged that being an active duty law enforcement officer ensures the person’s physical fitness and that they will receive  regular training in a variety of skills.  There are of course, ways that the school district could  build these requirements into a school security position that could be filled by retired officers such as the school monitors. .

As mentioned above the Saratoga Springs Police officer who is the current SRO at the High School is a patrolman. A promotion from patrolman to a higher rank would mean reassigning this individual to a different duty.  Since the kind of person who hopefully would be assigned as an SRO would have some impressive skills in areas such as conflict resolution, one would expect this person to be on a career track within the department to higher pay and more responsibilities.  The SRO position then is one subject to periodic turnover as new officers assigned to this duty move up the chain of command. Employing retired law enforcement officers who are fit and properly trained would provide a greater chance of continuity than an SRO.

An Aspect That May Have Contributed To The Insurance Carrier’s Position on SROs

There has been some confusion over the District’s insurance carrier’s position on school safety.  While they recommended two SROs be employed they declined to address the rearming of monitors one way or the other.  I think it is important to acknowledge the difference in liability between SROs and monitors.  SROs are employed by their respective law enforcement agencies.  In the Saratoga Springs District that would be the Saratoga Springs Police Department and the Saratoga County Sheriff’s Department.  As employees of these external organizations any liability would be shared between the school district and the respective law enforcement agencies.  Monitors, on the other hand, would be employed by the district.  In this case the district and their insurer would be solely liable for their actions.  While this may not be the only reason the insurance carrier took a clear position only on the SROs, it may have been a factor.

The Warren County Model

Warren County has developed an interesting program to address school safety in an affordable way. 

The New York State retirement system limits income for retired law enforcement officers who take on publically funded jobs to no more than $30,000.00.  What Warren County has done is to hire retired law enforcement officers as temporary employees.  They work as SROs  until they hit their maximum.  The county pays  $22.50 per hour without health or retirement benefits.  This is $5.00 more than the armed grounds monitors in the Saratoga Springs School District had been making.   Contrast that to the $72,000.00 per year the Saratoga Spring School District pays for an SRO assigned by the local sheriff’s department with additional money coming from the County.

Warren County  circumscribes the job of an SRO to differentiate it from a regular law enforcement officer.  The contract under which these SROs operate precludes them from making arrests or involving themselves in the disciplining of students.  Any criminal activity at the school is referred to local law enforcement and any other student violations are referred to the school administration.  The goal is for the students to see these SROs as a resource in the interest of safety.

It is my understanding that the current contract between the union representing the police in Saratoga Springs and the city would not allow retired officers to be hired as temporary employees but it would be something to consider when contract negotiations come up again in the future.

Here is an excellent article about local SROs in general and Warren County in particular. 

The Bottom Line

The issues about employing staff to protect students is not a simple one.  In the end, it involves people of good will to be open and creative in engaging in how best we can find an affordable solution for protecting the students, teachers, and staff in the District.

---

NASRO

From Mac Hardy, Director of Operations, NASRO

Q: “Can you tell me if your organization supports active duty law enforcement (working part time as security for a school) and retired police officers carrying firearms on school campus?  My understanding is that NASRO does support them as School Security Monitors as long as they have undergone NASRO’s 3 day training seminar.”

A: “Yes, we strongly believe they need specialized training.” – Mac Hardy

From Mo Canaday, Executive Director, NASRO

From: Mo Canady <mo.canady@nasro.org>
Date: Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 2:37 PM
Subject: FW: Follow up

Good Morning All,

In reviewing everything that you have sent to us, I have come to the conclusion that NASRO’s position on firearms on a school campus is very likely being used without proper context in this debate. 

Our guidance in no way automatically eliminates retired law enforcement officers (LEO) from the ability to serve as an SRO.  However, there is a right and wrong way to do this.  If a retired LEO is going to serve as an SRO, his law enforcement authority and credentials must be restored in order to comply with the federal definition of an SRO.  So an important question here would be in regards to the status of the Grounds Monitors.  It is my understanding that they are retired LEO’s but do they have full law enforcement authority as well credentials?

If the answer is no, then they do not fit the definition of on an SRO.

If the answer is yes, then they can certainly fit the definition.  But there are other variables to consider such as; how long they have been retired, if they are still physically fit to do the job, if their skill set has diminished.

I will use myself as an example.  I have been retired from law enforcement for over eight years.  I am in good shape, but not the physical condition that I was in when I retired.  And my skill set has certainly diminished.  I would not consider myself a good candidate to return to active duty at least at this very moment.  So the selection of retired officers must be done with great care. 

Retired officers can certainly serve effectively as SRO’s but within a very careful set of parameters. 

I hope that this is helpful to you. 

 Mo Canady

Executive Director 
NASRO

---

From: Peter Martin <peter.martin@saratoga-springs.org>
Date: March 26, 2019 at 10:40:34 AM EDT
To: John Kaufmann <>
Cc: John Daley <john.daley@saratoga-springs.org>
Subject: Fwd: SRO

John,

I believe that the term “School Resource Officer” has different meanings in different states.  In New York State, there are two sources of courses for active duty police officers that have been approved by the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Service.  These organizations are the National School Resource Officer Association and the NYS Juvenile Officers Association.  Both have websites with significant information about their courses.  I believe that the courses offered by these two organizations are similar – they involve 38 hours of instruction over 5 days.  There is also an advanced course of study for an additional five days.

We currently have only one trained School Resource Officer in the Saratoga Springs Police Department.  We anticipate sending more officers for training this year.  When our SRO is not available, we do not have another officer cover unless there are special circumstances.  We do coordinate with the School District for extra police presence during certain events.  For example, we may send additional officers to cover a popular basketball or football game.  Coverage for these events is usually planned well in advance, although SSPD will respond with additional coverage whenever requested. 

Regards,

Peter Martin

 

Peter R. Martin
Commissioner of Public Safety
City of Saratoga Springs

I went down to the Saratoga County Board of Elections today to review the petitions for the candidates who were not endorsed by the Republican or Democratic city committees and so circulated petitions independently.  Two of the candidates are seeking to replace members of the Saratoga Springs City Council.  Tim Holmes is seeking to unseat Mayor Meg Kelly and Patricia Morrison is challenging Commissioner of Finance Michele Madigan.

An observant reader will note that a number of people who circulated petitions for more than one of these candidates also served  on the 2017 Charter Commission which advocated for a city manager form of government or were active in the leadership of the campaign to adopt it.

Members of that charter commission who circulated  petitions were Bob Turner (Chairman of the 2017 Charter Review  Commission), Pat Kane (Vice Chairman of the 2017 Commission), Laura Chodos, Ann Bullock, Gordon Boyd, and Minita Sanghvi.

Gordon Boyd, who last time I checked was a member of the Independence Party, is a notary which explains his petitioning for Holmes, a Republican, and the other candidates who are Democrats.  Only individuals who are members of the same party as the candidate on their petition can normally circulate it.  The one exception is a notary.

Active in the leadership of the charter change campaign were Ellen Egger-Aimone, Peter McTygue, Patty Morrison, and Dillon Moran.

As some of the readers of this blog may recall, during the campaign to pass their charter, Vice-Chairman Pat Kane left the following expletive laden message on Commissioner Skip Scirocco’s cell phone.

When pressed by the Saratogian to explain Kane’s message, charter chairman Bob Turner refused to apologize for his behavior but instead used it as an opportunity to repeat the talking points of the pro-charter change campaign.

At the subsequent charter commission meeting, not one person said anything about the behavior of their vice chair let alone advocated for a public apology.

For those of us hoping for some relief from the worst kind of politics this is going to be a long haul.

---

Following are complete lists of the people who circulated petitions for candidates who were not endorsed by the major parties:

For Mayor, Tim Holmes, Republican:

John Safford

Matt Hogan

Patrick Cromyn (Albany address)

Peter Gemellaro

Sean Cane

Pat Kane

Tim Holmes

John Huppich

David Solovy

Mark Pingel

Gordon Boyd

---

For Kendall Hicks, Public Safety, Democrat:

Ellen Egger-Aimone

Kendall Hicks

Patricia Morrison

Joy King

Steve Bederian

Alice Smith

Peter McTygue

Ann Bullock

Suzanne Kwasniewski

Shafer Gaston

Gordon Boyd

James Gould

Al Ormsby

Dianne Pedinotti

Otis Maxwell

Dillon Moran

Frank Capone

Molly Gagne

Bob Turner

Minita Sanghvi

Laura Chodos

Meaghan McEntee

---

For Patty Morrison, Finance, Democrat:

Ellen Egger-Aimone

Kathleen Harder

Alice Smith

Robert Turner

Steve Bederian

Peter McTygue

Ann Bullock

Minita Sanghvi

Kendall Hicks

Tom McTygue

Gordon Boyd

Mable Morrison (East Greenbush address)

Lisa Scerbo (Mechanicville)

Laura Chodos

Pamela Lonegran

Julie Walsh (Stillwater address)