
Former Saratoga Springs Commissioner of Finance Minita Sanghvi has posted a defense on her personal Facebook page of her management of the city’s finances during her two years in office. The city has found that she ran deficits in every budget she crafted during her four years in office, including the current budget under which the city is operating, which shows an approximately $5 million deficit.
Sanghvi cites all the increases in costs during her terms as contributing to the city’s financial problems, and they are considerable. It is true that retirement costs, health insurance, etc. have all been increasing, contributing to financial stress in many local municipalities, including Saratoga. Sanghvi does, however, make one stunning admission of culpability on her part alone: her failure to plan how the city would pay for major expenses incurred on her watch and with her support. Consistent with her chronic mismanagement, she seems unaware of the gravity of her admission. In her piece, she writes:
Now here is the thing about fire-fighters overtime. The mayor signed an agreement with the fire-fighters union about making sure there were 4 people on a firetruck. There are several studies that show that this is safer for fire-fighters. But it is also important to note that in Saratoga Springs a mayor can sign ANY agreement with unions on their pay, benefits, etc. without getting a financial impact statement from the Finance department. I should have asked the mayor to wait on that agreement and should have provided the city a financial impact statement as they do at the county. (But this is something I have learned from my time as County Supervisor) [JK:Emphasis added]
So, what is a “financial impact study?” It is a fancy phrase for whether something is affordable. It is beyond stunning that Sanghvi would make this statement, because it speaks to the folly of all her budgets that included many additional items for the city’s operations, which she approved and voted for, for which she apparently did not bother to conduct “impact statements.”
She Was Warned
In a post way back on October 5, 2022, I warned in this blog that the SAFER grant to hire the sixteen firefighters that the city had applied for was a time bomb. I wrote to Sanghvi repeatedly, asking what the plan was for paying for these additional firefighters after the grant ended, and never received a reply.
When Mayor Kim brought the contract with the firefighters’ union, referred to in the above quote, before the Council for adoption, he cavalierly noted that the city’s labor attorney had warned him to include a sunset clause in the agreement, which he dismissed. The contract, which Sanghvi voted for, would require the city to spend approximately an additional $2,000,000.00 a year to cover the cost of these firefighters once the federal grant ended. Sanghvi now admits as Finance Commissioner she should have planned for this. It is truly amazing that in four years as Finance Commissioner this never occurred to her. Since it is in the contract without a sunset clause, we are perpetually locked into paying this money. It is a major factor in the city’s current fiscal crisis.
So the city can’t renegotiate the contract with the firefighters union?
On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 3:48 PM Saratoga Springs Politics < comment-reply@wordpress.com> wrote:
LikeLike
What does the city offer them to give it up?
LikeLike
I am struck by Minita Sanghvi’s comment that it was only after spending a few months as a County Supervisor that she realized it was a good idea to figure how you were going to pay for something before incurring a major expense. The blogger made an effort to call this to her attention to no avail and she is a Skidmore professor in their economics department. I have to wonder how she has dealt with this issue in her personal life. I believe she and her wife own a home. Did they not sit down and plan how they would pay for this before negotiating for a mortgage?
LikeLike
Typical Minita:
“I was the most transparent Finance Commissioner.”
“I have made it a policy not to respond to attacks.”
LikeLike
spot on Duke. Her talent is skillful lies. Cover up being really transparent by stating the opposite. And then saying she doesn’t “respond to attacks” by responding.
LikeLike
Whatever people think about the prior Commissioner, Madigan at least always had a detailed analysis of what a new contract would mean for the city. That the mayor and other commissioners didn’t ask Sanghvi to do the same shows how little they thought of her, and that she still voted for the contracts without demanding time to review shows how bad she was at the job.
Saratoga will be paying for the sins of her and Moran for a long time.
LikeLike
However,“Whatever you think…”? While there may certainly be people who aren’t fond of the former Commissioner, for whatever their reasons—some perhaps personally vindictive rather than professional, as can happen with anyone who holds a political position—I’m not sure why there was a need to qualify your positive comment in that manner.
Perhaps, regardless of your own opinion, you’ve forgotten that Commissioner Madigan accomplished more than a decade of solid budgets, maintained flat taxes, and helped the city achieve a AAA+ bond rating. She also saved the city money that it continues to save today by championing the solar array on Wieble Avenue.
It seems to me that she was consistently working on projects that were sustainable and productive for the city, often going above and beyond the responsibilities of her role as Finance Commissioner to advocate for the long-term interests of Saratoga Springs.
While I’m sure former Commissioner Madigan appreciates your positive observation and as her good friend I do as well. That said, you certainly don’t have to like her personally or agree with every decision she made. But it seems fair to acknowledge the tangible results of her tenure without feeling the need to qualify a positive observation about her.
In fact, the City and beyond would do well to consider this regularly in making any comments or observations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Henry37 is not anti-Firefighter. Please, do not think that I am. I have made previous comments regarding Firefighter overtime, and the staffing of Station Three, that could be interpreted that I am against Firefighters.
What I am against is the ineptitude of Mayor Kim. And the ineptitude of the City Council members who agreed with Mayor Kim, with their votes of approval for the Firefighters contract.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I recall Minita offering council and concern about what will happen when the grant runs out. So, let’s place blame across all 5 seats for that folly.
That said…. The school district increases taxes by a public vote every year. Politicians should stop shunning tax increases. Shit’s getting expensive. Costs are rising. Raise taxes! Michele should have…. Even marginally to allow more reserve to be spent. Minita should have. And Joanne needs to continue to do so.
LikeLike