The CEO of Saratoga Hospital Attempts To Explain To The Public The New Affiliation With Saratoga Hospital

Norreida Reyes has done a terrific job in taking some very modest resources and putting out a very interesting newspaper, Saratoga Today. She recently did an interview with Angelo Calbone who is the CEO of Saratoga Hospital.  The interview was quite revealing but not in ways that Mr. Calbone may have hoped for.


From Wikipedia

Doublespeak is language that deliberately obscures, disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words. Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms (e.g., “downsizing” for layoffs, “servicing the target” for bombing[1]), in which case it is primarily meant to make the truth sound more palatable. It may also refer to intentional ambiguity in language or to actual inversions of meaning (for example, naming a state of war “peace”). In such cases, doublespeak disguises the nature of the truth. Doublespeak is most closely associated with political language.[2][3]


From the Times Union:

The proposal would give Albany Med authority over Saratoga Hospital’s budgets and strategic plans, the hiring and firing of Saratoga Hospital’s chief executive, incurrence of debt, and hospital policies and procedures. Each health system would have representation on the other’s board.


From The Albany Business Review:

Under the agreement, Albany Med would have approval of Saratoga’s budgets and operating plans, hospital policies and procedures and contracts for clinical and management services. Albany Med would also have authority to appoint or remove the CEO, according to information submitted to the health department.


The following is from an interview the CEO, Angelo Calbone gave to Saratoga Today Newspaper in their July 1 edition:

Regarding the AMC affiliation, Calbone explained that it was a multi-year process that involved many thorough discussions with the board. “The board has a responsibility to know and understand how this will work,” said Calbone. “We spent upwards of two years in negotiating the specific terms of the relationship, making sure a very high degree of local autonomy and control stays intact.”

Calbone explained that creating a meaningful affiliation is done through a parent model in New York State, and it is how the State Department of Health regulates them. Although the model does list Albany Medical Center as the parent, the terms in detail are unique to this particular affiliation of the two institutions, and not readily apparent in the public eye [my emphasis added].

“So, internally we knew that is how this structure would work, but ‘parent’ is just a term that is used to describe how relationships are built, and doesn’t reflect the years of negotiations on specific terms. What I believe has happened is that individuals have probably looked at the regs as they are stated in somewhat generic form as to how parent relationships in hospitals work in the State of New York, and took it literally,” [My emphasis: I mean why would we take the regulations’ language literally?] Calbone added. “But unless they were in the room with the board, they won’t know the details. This meets the spirit of those regulations, but leaves a high level of local control and autonomy in place.”

The reason they had to use the parent model goes back to anti-trust laws and other legalities that protect the American public. “We are a business,” said Calbone, “and we cannot work closely as two institutions on regional planning, working to create programs, sharing of information and movement of potential medical education back and forth; you just can’t do some of those things without a relationship because it would break the law. You must connect yourself sufficiently to do it in New York State, and that’s called a parent model.”

Calbone said unequivocally that Saratoga Hospital remains a licensed hospital, which by its nature requires a number of responsibilities to be maintained by the local board. He confirmed that the parent, AMC, would have to approve the local board members.

Although it is a confidential agreement, Calbone could say, however, that the board members put before AMC would first be recruited, interviewed, and vetted by the local board before they are put forward for action by the parent. “Also, they can’t be denied and replaced by other candidates,” said Calbone. “They can only come through the local process of the local board. You wouldn’t know that unless you were part of the negotiations.”

For Calbone’s role, the local board can unilaterally dismiss any CEO they don’t find acceptable, but in choosing a new one, it will be done collaboratively. He said the “parent model” term has been over-interpreted as too dominant, but emphasized that the standard written into regulations [JK: Oh those pesky regulations again] don’t reflect the very unique relationship established between the institutions that is very respectful of the history of the hospital and the value the local board brings to oversee the operations.

“We weren’t forced to do this,” said Calbone. “The local board felt this was the best time to move ahead and it would be helpful to us and our patients. There is grave risk to institutions over the next five years and we choose to take this time to do this while we are successful.”

Some Welcome Clarification On Walkway

I have been copying the city council on my emails to Mayor Yepsen regarding the walkway beside Putnam Market.  As of this date after two emails I have not heard from Mayor Yepsen.    I  did, however, receive an email from Commissioner Mathiesen.  He indicated that the walkway will not be fixed until the fall.  I followed up with a telephone conversation.  He explained that because the walkway is heated, the fix will involve blocking off the entire walkway.  In light of its role as an easy pedestrian access to parking from Broadway, it makes sense to do it after the racing season.

I raised with him the issue of what can be done to compel the owner to keep the area clean.  Commissioner Mathiesen assumed that this would have been stipulated in the site plan agreed to when the easement was granted.  He is going to have his code enforcement officer look into the matter.  I will keep the readers of this blog informed.

 

Walkway: More Trash And No Response From Mayor

 

DSCN4766

DSCN4768

It has been a week since I emailed the Mayor asking that she take action about the dreadful condition of the walkway beside Putnam Market.  I visited the walkway today and found that there is still trash there and of course, the sawhorse blocking one set of stairs remains.  Regrettably I had no response from last Thursday’s email to the Mayor so I have written her again.Hopefully she will assign someone to find out who the owners of the walkway are so we can all find out when they are going to fix the broken stairs and when they are going to start to police the walk of trash.

Here is my latest email to the Mayor.

From: John Kaufmann []
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 7:46 PM
To: ‘Joanne Yepsen’
Cc: ‘Christian Mathiesen’; ‘Michele Madigan’; ‘Skip Sciroco’; ‘John Franck’;
‘Vincent DeLeonardis’; ‘Tony Izzo’
Subject: Walkway

Last Thursday I emailed you (see below) about the deplorable condition of the walkway next to Putnam Market.  Having not had response, I visited the walkway again and I attach pictures of the newest trash there.
As noted in my email, I recognize how important our city is to you so I expected to hear from you on this matter.  Do you plan to take any action?
Thank you

Sent June 23:

I have been contacted by people disturbed by the walkway that abuts Putnam Market.  For at least a month there have been sawhorses blocking part of the path there (see picture).  In addition, there does not appear to be any maintenance of the area.  The walkway is strategically located at one of the center points of the city but it has been allowed to become an unsightly embarrassment.  Trash has been allowed to accumulate there (see pictures).
I have been in touch with the Public Works Department and have learned that this area is privately owned and is not under the jurisdiction of Public Works.  I understand that the heating system that is supposed to keep the walkway free of snow needs to be repaired.  I expect that this might be a major engineering project and can understand that this cannot
be fixed overnight.  I have learned that the owner does not expect to begin work on this until after the cing season is over.  Whether this is a reasonable time frame, I do not know.  What I do know is that the walkway is dirty and unbecoming of our city.
Has the city taken any action on this matter?  If not, can the city take action to require the owner to keep the area clean and to expeditiously do whatever repairs are necessary to remove the sawhorses?
I know you take as much pride in our city as any citizen of this community and expect that you share people’s concerns that this problem be addressed.    Could you please keep me advised on this and I will share the progress with the people who read my blog.